RECRUITING AND INTERVIEWING NON-METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS FOR QUALITATIVE STUDY PARTICIPATION VIA AN INTERNET-BASED DIGITAL PATIENT COMMUNITY
Author(s)
Tomaszewski EL1, Krupnick R2, Moïse P3, Downing J4, Holmstrom S5
1Quintiles, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2Quintiles Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3Quintiles Consulting Europe, Levallois-Perret, France, 4Quintiles, Durham, North Carolina, USA, 5HEOR, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, The Netherlands
OBJECTIVES: To perform a qualitative patient interview study using an internet-based digital patient platform for recruitment and telephone and webcam for interviews. METHODS: To design the qualitative study we followed the steps outlined in the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1 (Patrick et al, 2011). Briefly, a qualitative interview guide was developed and approved by IRB. Participants were recruited, consented, enrolled, and interviewed online. Each interview was audio recorded and transcribed. Analysis of the qualitative data was performed by experienced market researchers. RESULTS: Screening, demographic, and medical information was gathered directly from patients online, via the internet, with no interaction from the patient’s physician(s) or site. Existing members of MediGuard, an online free medication monitoring service, were sent an email invitation to participate in the study. Members who choose to click on the link were directed to a website where they accessed information regarding the study, provided consent to participate, self-screened for eligibility, and reported baseline characteristics. Consented participants were contacted via phone to schedule a time to participate in an individual interview via telephone or webcam. Interviews were audio recorded, and lasted 60-75 minutes. 17 patients were interviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting and interviewing patients via the internet and phone is a feasible, faster, and potentially lower cost alternative to face to face interviews. Some benefits of direct to patient research include potential to reduce patient travel burden to a study site and access to patients who are home bound or located in remote geographic locations. This novel approach did not seem to alter the participant’s ability to participate in a qualitative study.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)
Code
PCN147
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Oncology