REAL-WORLD COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF RIVAROXABAN AND WARFARIN IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS
Author(s)
Laliberté F1, Cloutier M1, Nelson WW2, Coleman CI3, Pilon D1, Olson WH4, Damaraju CV5, Schein JR2, Lefebvre P1
1Groupe d’analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA, 3University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA, 4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA, 5Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: Rivaroxaban was shown to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in a randomized controlled trial setting. The study objective was to assess real-world safety, effectiveness, and persistence of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular AF patients. METHODS: Healthcare claims from Symphony Health Solutions’ Patient Transactional Datasets from 5/2011-7/2012 were analyzed. Adult patients newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin, with ≥2 AF diagnoses (ICD-9-CM: 427.31), and a CHADS2 score ≥1 during the 180-day baseline period were included. Cohorts were matched 1:4 using propensity score methods. Study outcomes were major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, composite stroke and systemic embolism, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) events (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]). Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare event and persistence rates. RESULTS: The matched sample included 3,654 rivaroxaban and 14,616 warfarin patients. Matching was adequate, with all standardized differences in patient characteristics <10%. Mean age of both cohorts was 73 years; 51% were female. The mean (SD) drug exposure for the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts was 83 (58.0) and 114 (70.2) days, respectively. No significant differences were observed for bleeding, and the composite stroke and systemic embolism outcomes, although rivaroxaban users were associated with significantly fewer VTE events (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.91, p=0.0250) compared to warfarin users. Rivaroxaban was also associated with a significantly lower risk of treatment non-persistence (HR= 0.66; 95%CI: 0.60-0.72, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that rivaroxaban and warfarin do not differ significantly in real-world rates of composite stroke and systemic embolism and major, intracranial, or GI bleeding. Rivaroxaban was associated with significantly fewer VTE events and better treatment persistence compared with warfarin.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)
Code
PCV5
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders