IMPACT OF ROFLUMILAST ON HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND COSTS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE IN REAL-WORLD SETTINGS
Author(s)
Corman S1, Wan Y2, Sun SX3, Gao X1
1Pharmerit North America LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA, 3Forest Laboratories, Inc., Jersey City, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: To compare real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs among patients initiated roflumilast compared to those initiated other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) medications. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed using LifelinkTM Health Plan Claims Database. We included patients with a diagnosis of COPD who initiated roflumilast (roflumilast group) or any other ≥3 COPD maintenance drugs (non-roflumilast group) between May 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. Patients must have been enrolled for 12 months prior to (baseline period) and 3 months after (follow-up period) the initiation date, be ≥40 years old, not corticosteroid-dependent, and without asthma diagnosis at baseline. Office and emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and total healthcare costs were compared between study groups using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Difference-in-difference (DID) models were used to compare the change from baseline in hospitalizations and costs between groups while adjusting for baseline differences. RESULTS: During the baseline period, patients in the roflumilast group (N=710) had significantly more office visits, ED visits, hospitalizations, and greater total costs than patients in the non-roflumilast group (N=13,501). The changes from baseline were: monthly frequency of office visits (0.081 in roflumilast vs 0.122 in non-roflumilast group; p=0.01), ED visits (0.009 vs 0.007; p=0.80), hospital admissions (0.002 vs 0.005; p=0.02), and monthly costs ($432 vs $522; p=0.34). After controlling for key covariates using DID models, roflumilast was associated with numerically lower hospital admissions (β=-0.003, p=0.57) and total costs (β=-116, p=0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller increase in office visits, hospitalizations and total costs during follow-up from baseline was observed in roflumilast vs non-roflumilast group. A longer follow-up time may be needed to assess potential improvement in these economic outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)
Code
PRS33
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders