COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SAXAGLIPTIN AND LINAGLIPTIN IN COMBINATION WITH METFORMIN FOR TYPE II DIABETES- A DECISION-TREE ANALYSIS MODEL
Author(s)
Sawant RV1, Sansgiry SS2
1University Of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 2University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of two dipeptidyl-peptidase inhibitors, saxagliptin and linagliptin, used in combination with metformin for the treatment of Type II diabetes. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed using cost and effectiveness data for saxagliptin + metformin and linagliptin + metformin using published literature. Costs were evaluated using third party payer's perspective and included costs of drugs, physician visits, lab tests, hospital costs, and costs associated with adverse events. All costs were adjusted to 2013 dollars using consumer price index and were calculated for a period of one year. A comprehensive literature review of Pubmed, Cochrane library and Google Scholar was conducted to obtain data for clinical efficacy and costs. Clinical efficacy values were obtained from randomized clinical trials. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c levels <7.0%. Base case analysis was analyzed as incremental cost per effective treatment. One way sensitivity analysis was performed by varying costs by 10% associated with drug treatment to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, saxagliptin was found to have better clinical outcomes and lower costs than linagliptin as a combination therapy with metformin with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of 30.51. Considering only direct costs for the treatment, expected cost per effective treatment for a year was found to be $179.25 for saxagliptin while that for linagliptin was $298.99. Sensitivity analysis also indicated saxagliptin to be the dominant treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin in our study was found to be favored over linagliptin in combination with metformin for the treatment of Type II Diabetes. These results may help decision makers develop appropriate treatment options. Type II diabetes being a lifestyle disorder, further research by inclusion of indirect costs associated with the treatment options may help strengthening the results.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)
Code
PDB75
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders