BRAF TARGETED THERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC MELANOMA- A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
Author(s)
Shih V1, ten Ham RM2, Bui CT1, Tran DN1, Wilson LS3
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Melanoma is one of the fastest growing cancers worldwide and prognosis is poor with metastases. In about 50% of melanoma patients the BRAFV600 protein kinase mutation is present. Two BRAFV600 targeted therapies dabrafenib (Tafinlar®) and vemurafenib (Zelboraf®), have recently received U.S. approval to treat metastatic melanoma in BRAFV600patients. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of BRAF inhibitors compared to traditional chemotherapy (dacarbazine). METHODS: A Markov model was developed with three health states: stable disease, progression, and death and taking a lifetime societal perspective. Transition probabilities and clinical outcomes were derived from Phase III trials. Costs were in 2013 USD and derived from literature, national databases, and Medicare fees. Utilities for melanoma and other health states were obtained from studies conducted on the general public. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were run to test the impact of uncertainties. RESULTS: Cumulative cost of dacarbazine, dabrafenib and vemurafenib respectively were $15,282, $43,895, and $59,768. Monthly Drug costs were respectively $537, $7,570, and $10,807. Effectiveness of dacarbazine, vemurafenib and dabrafenib were 0.37, 0.5 and 0.52 LY, respectively and quality adjusted were 0.22, 0.35 and 0.39 QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $14,569 per QALY for dabrafenib compared to dacarbazine. Dabrafenib dominated vemurafenib. For sensitivity analysis, 95% of the variance was accounted for by health state utilities and cost of dabrafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Dabrafenib is the most cost-effective treatment for metastatic melanoma in patients with BRAFV600 mutation given our assumptions. Given the similar QALYs and side effects profile of dabrafenib and vemurafenib, but higher drug cost of vemurafenib, a 25% price reduction for vemurafenib could bring this drug into the cost-effective range. A specific decrease of 63% in utility of progression on dabrafenib or a minimum decrease of 28% for utility of stable disease on dabrafenib is needed to make vemurafenib the most cost-effective option.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)
Code
PCN95
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology