BORTEZOMIB-BASED REGIMENS USED AS INDUCTION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA (NDMM) PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (SCT)- THE COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Mucha J1, Walczak J1, Tronczynski K2, Skrzekowska-Baran I2
1Arcana Institute, Krakow, Poland, 2Janssen-Cilag Polska, Warszawa, Poland

OBJECTIVES: To perform cost-utility analysis (CUA) of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone (VD) or thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) used as induction treatments in ndMM patients eligible for SCT in Poland. METHODS: The Markov model was developed in Microsoft Excel and programmed in Visual Basic for Applications. The lifetime horizon and National Health Fund (NHF) perspective were taken into account. Five health states were considered: 1st line intensive treatment (i.e. induction, stem cell harvest, high dose chemotherapy and SCT), 2nd, 3rd, further lines of treatment and death. Since CTD regimen (cyclophosphamide + thalidomide + dexamethasone) is recommended by Polish clinical guidelines as the most appropriate treatment in ndMM patients, both VD and VTD were compared to CTD. Moreover, VD and VTD were compared to VAD (vincristine + doxorubicine + dexamethasone) and TD (thalidomide + dexamethasone) regimens, respectively. Data on clinical effectiveness regarding induction treatment were retrieved from three RCTs: IFM 2005-01 (VD vs VAD), PETHEMA (VTD vs TD) and Morgan 2012 (arm for CTD only). Data on 2nd, 3rd and further treatment lines came from APEX and eVOBS studies and utilities from Van Agthoven 2004

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PSY35

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×