BORTEZOMIB-BASED REGIMENS USED AS INDUCTION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA (NDMM) PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (SCT)- THE COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
Author(s)
Mucha J1, Walczak J1, Tronczynski K2, Skrzekowska-Baran I2
1Arcana Institute, Krakow, Poland, 2Janssen-Cilag Polska, Warszawa, Poland
OBJECTIVES: To perform cost-utility analysis (CUA) of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone (VD) or thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) used as induction treatments in ndMM patients eligible for SCT in Poland. METHODS: The Markov model was developed in Microsoft Excel and programmed in Visual Basic for Applications. The lifetime horizon and National Health Fund (NHF) perspective were taken into account. Five health states were considered: 1st line intensive treatment (i.e. induction, stem cell harvest, high dose chemotherapy and SCT), 2nd, 3rd, further lines of treatment and death. Since CTD regimen (cyclophosphamide + thalidomide + dexamethasone) is recommended by Polish clinical guidelines as the most appropriate treatment in ndMM patients, both VD and VTD were compared to CTD. Moreover, VD and VTD were compared to VAD (vincristine + doxorubicine + dexamethasone) and TD (thalidomide + dexamethasone) regimens, respectively. Data on clinical effectiveness regarding induction treatment were retrieved from three RCTs: IFM 2005-01 (VD vs VAD), PETHEMA (VTD vs TD) and Morgan 2012 (arm for CTD only). Data on 2nd, 3rd and further treatment lines came from APEX and eVOBS studies and utilities from Van Agthoven 2004
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)
Code
PSY35
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Systemic Disorders/Conditions