A COST UTILITY ANALYSIS OF CYP2D6 PHARMACOGENETIC GUIDED DOSING VS STANDARD DOSING OF RISPERIDONE FOR TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA

Author(s)

Yep T, Devine B
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Risperidone is a commonly used antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia. Its major metabolic pathway is through the liver enzyme CYP2D6. Variants of CYP2D6 confer differing activity levels. Poor metabolizer phenotype is suspected to increase the risk of adverse drug reactions that could lead to risperidone discontinuation and poor patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the potential costs and outcomes of a pharmacogenetic-guided risperidone treatment strategy for use in schizophrenics. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the incremental cost per QALY gained (ICER) and cost per relapse and hospitalization avoided, associated with a pharmacogenetic-guided strategy compared to a standard treatment approach for a hypothetical schizophrenic patient initiated on risperidone. We used a one-year time horizon and a payer perspective. Model probabilities, costs, and utilities were obtained from the literature. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the possible range of results. RESULTS: For one patient entering the model, pharmacogenetic-guided treatment increased QALYs  (0.00047), and prevented relapses (0.00782) as well as relapse-associated hospitalizations (0.00235) at an increased total cost ($167). This resulted in an ICER of $356,356, and costs of $21,468 per relapse avoided and $71,561 per hospitalization avoided relative to standard treatment. Findings were robust to one-way sensitivity analyses and did not change the base case conclusions.  CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a pharmacogenetic-guided treatment approach for risperidone may confer a small reduction in relapses and consequent hospitalizations, and a very minimal increase in QALYs for relatively low additional cost compared to standard treatment. However, the large ICER suggests this approach is not cost effective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PMH52

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×