UNLOCKING ESTABLISHED PRODUCTS PATIENT AND SOCIETAL VALUE IN ADDITIONAL INDICATIONS

Author(s)

Nayroles G1, Gabriel S1, Toumi M2, Kornfeld A3, Frybourg S3, Antonanzas F4, Espin J5, Jommi C6, de Pouvourville G7, Tolley K8, Wasem J9
1IPSEN Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 2Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France, 3Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France, 4University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain, 5Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain, 6Cergas, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy, 7ESSEC Business School, Cergy-Pontoise, France, 8Tolley Health Economics, Buxton, UK, 9University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

Background New indications for established products (EPs) – marketed for 8 years or more - may represent a high societal value; but pharmaceutical manufacturers criticize the disincentives to expand indication of EPs and deliver the potential value for the society, such as lack of intellectual propriety or data protection, price cuts for new indication, generic competition, internal reference pricing. Incentive policies for orphan drugs or pediatric indications have driven EP development in these specific areas. Capturing the societal benefit of EP development is on the European Commission agenda. The objective of this research was to propose new potential incentives for the development of EPs through an international expert panel. Discussion The expert panel suggested the following incentives for EPs that provide an added value in new indications:
  • To extend the market protection period following introduction of a new indication
  • To develop differential pricing regulation for different indications of the same active ingredient.
  • Three processes may help achieving differential pricing:
    • Differential market access agreement such as rebate or other financial-based or outcome-based managed market entry agreements for different indications
    • Electronic prescription including indication to ensure the right product is used for each specific indication when generic do not match extension of indication
    • To avoid or delay systematic therapeutic reference pricing
Conclusion Current regulations can represent a serious disincentive to develop new indications for EPs. EPs may offer treatment options with well-known safety. They have a potential to reduce off-label use and contain prescription escalation toward expensive products. Policy changes, both regulatory, through data protection and market exclusivity, and pricing, by rewarding the effort to bring new indication for EPs, are needed to capture the full societal value of EPs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PHP365

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×