TREATMENT RATES IN PATIENTS WITH HER2+ METASTATIC BREAST CANCER AND THE FACTORS INFLUENCING TREATMENT DECISION

Author(s)

Colomer R1, Hall P2, szkultecka-Debek M3, Bondi R4, Flinois A5, Auziere S5, Le Cleach J5
1Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain, 2Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Edinburgh, UK, 3Roche, Warsaw, Poland, 4Roche, Basel, Switzerland, 5Kantar Health, Paris, France

OBJECTIVES:  Determine which factors influence the likelihood to receive an anti-tumor treatment for HER2+ metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) METHODS:  This retrospective chart review conducted in 2016 collected information from patient medical records in the UK, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands. 204 oncologists documented all HER2+ mBC patients seen during a 2-3 week period. The 3068 documented patients were classified as those receiving an anti-tumor treatment (ATT) and those receiving supportive care only (SCo, no ATT). RESULTS:  10% of patients with HER2+ mBC did not receive a first ATT at metastatic stage and received SCo. Patients receiving SCo were diagnosed later (74 y.o. on average vs. 59) and had a degraded performance score (65% with PS 2+ vs. 14%) compared to patients receiving 1st mBC ATT. Patients in the SCo group were also more frequently diagnosed with de novo mBC (70% vs. 52%), with cerebral metastases (26% vs. 7%) and with metastases in at least 2 sites (60% vs. 53%). 55% of the patients who received a first metastatic ATT subsequently received a second ATT. The remainder (45%) received SCo .Patients receiving SCo after 1st mBC ATT were on average older than those receiving a 2nd ATT (70 y.o. vs. 58) and had a degraded PS (89% with PS 2+ vs. 15%). More of the patients receiving SCo had cerebral metastases: 35% vs. 17%. The factors influencing initiation of SCo after conclusion of the 2ndATT were similar to those described earlier: age, PS and metastatic burden. CONCLUSIONS:  While the majority of HER2+ mBC patients received a 1st line ATT, half did not receive a 2nd line of ATT, indicating that there is an need for a novel method of anti-tumor management for patients currently ineligible to receive standard anti-tumor treatment due to their age, performance status, metastases or other factors.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN309

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×