ECONOMIC BURDEN OF COLORECTAL RESECTIONS- INCREMENTAL EFFECTS IN CANCER PATIENTS

Author(s)

Yoo A1, Hsiao C2, Cheng H2, Kalsekar I1
1Johnson & Johnson Co., New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2Global Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA

OBJECTIVES:  To quantify the resource utilization of colorectal resections as expressed in Operating Room Time (ORT), Length of Stay (LOS) and Hospitalization Costs and to estimate the incremental burden in cancer patients. METHODS: The Premier Perspective® Database containing billing data from over 600 hospitals in the U.S was utilized. All elective inpatient LEFT (hemi-colectomy or sigmoidectomy), RIGHT (cecectomy or hemicolectomy), and lower anterior resections (LAR) from 2008-2014 were identified. Resource utilization parameters of ORT, LOS and hospital costs (2014 US Dollars) were computed from the billing data. Patient’s cancer status was identified based on ICD-9 diagnosis codes for colorectal cancer. Patient, procedure, and hospital factors were identified and included in multivariable models evaluating the association of cancer status and resource utilization. Analyses were conducted in the overall sample and within resection types and accounted for the clustering of patients within hospitals; p values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS:  A total of 111,785 patients undergoing colorectal resections were identified in the study (LEFT = 50,643; RIGHT = 47,620; LAR = 13,522) and 42.5% had colorectal cancer. The average ORT was 205 mins (SD=243), with a mean LOS of 6.2 days (SD=5.4) and overall hospital costs of $17,868 (SD=$17,655). After adjusting for patient, procedural and provider characteristics, cancer patients had significantly higher resource burden compared to patients without cancer (1.1% higher ORT,3.8% higher LOS, and 3.1% higher costs; all p values <0.05). These differences were most pronounced in patients undergoing LAR (6.7% higher ORT, 9.0% higher LOS, and 9.2% higher costs) followed by RIGHT (2.9% higher ORT, 4.4% higher LOS, and 3.6% higher costs). No significant difference based on cancer status was observed in LEFT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing colorectal resections have high economic burden and the inpatient resource utilization is higher for patients with cancer.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PMD37

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×