COST PER RESPONDER ANALYSIS OF SUCROFFERRIC OXHYDROXIDE VERSUS SEVELAMER CARBONATE IN PATIENTS ON HEMODIALYSIS IN EUROPE
Author(s)
Connolly M1, Kotsopoulos N2, Vrouchou P3, Dubois E3, Walpen S3
1University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2Global Market Access Solutions, Saint-Prex, Switzerland, 3Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma, Glattbrugg, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES: Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) is a novel non calcium, iron based phosphate binder indicated for the control of serum phosphorus (sPhos) levels in adult chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). A retrospective database analysis of SFOH among in-center HD patients who switched from sevelamer carbonate (SEV) to SFOH, showed that, after 6 months, patients switching from SEV with in-range sPhos (3.5-5.5 mg/dl) increased from 14.1% to 27.9% (98% increase) whilst pill burden decreased from 10.1 pills with SEV to 3.9 pills with SFOH suggesting lower cost per patient responding with SFOH. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the 6-monhtly cost per responder for SFOH versus SEV in Europe. METHODS: Acquisition costs per pill of SFOH and SEV were estimated based on official list prices, weighted for local market shares. Treatment costs were estimated based on the observed daily pill intake, obtained from the retrospective data analysis. Number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve in-range sPhos (3.5-5.5 mg/dl) were estimated and subsequently the 6-monthly costs per responder were estimated for SFOH and SEV. RESULTS: The estimated NNT was 3.6 and 7 for SFOH and SEV, respectively. SFOH consistently attained in-range sPhos (3.5-5.5 mg/dl) at a lower 6-monthly cost per patient compared to SEV. The 6-monthly cost per responder for SFOH and (SEV) were: Austria: €4,511 (€23,319); France: €3,699 (€13,416); Germany: €4,194 (€17,279); Italy: €4,755 (€14,054); Spain: €3,503 (€15,307); UK €6,355 (€25,381); Switzerland: €7,612 (€25,258). SFOH appeared to attain in-range sPhos (3.5-5.5 mg/dl) with considerable 6-monthly cost-savings per patient responding ranging from €9,299 (Italy) to €19, 026 (UK). CONCLUSIONS: SFOH appears to have a favorable NNT and to attain the clinical target of in-range sPhos at a lower cost compared to SEV suggesting favorable cost-effectiveness.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)
Code
PUK12
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders