COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF IBRUTINIB IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA IN THE NETHERLANDS

Author(s)

Welten H1, Ignacio TJ2, Verheggen BG2
1Janssen-Cilag BV, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 2Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES:   The objective of this pharmacoeconomic evaluation was to assess the life-time incremental costs and health benefits of ibrutinib compared to all relevant treatments in Dutch clinical practice for adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), from a societal perspective.  METHODS:   A partitioned survival model (3-month cycle length) was used to estimate and extrapolate treatment response, progression-free survival and overall survival for relapsed CLL patients receiving either ibrutinib or: ofatumumab, bendamustine+rituximab, bendamustine, fludarabine+cyclophosphamide+rituximab, rituximab monotherapy, rituximab+chlorambucil or chlorambucil monotherapy. Relative treatment efficacy was determined by direct (extrapolated) trial results for ibrutinib and ofatumumab (based on the RESONATE trial) and indirect treatment comparisons for the remaining comparators. Differences in treatment efficacy were translated to different probabilities of being in one of the model health states: “progression-free survival”, “post progression survival” or “death”. Patients’ baseline characteristics were derived from the Netherlands cancer registry (hemato-oncology/PHAROS). Dutch-specific costs for drugs, monitoring, resource use and adverse events, and health outcomes were calculated to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Uncertainties around cost and health outcomes were tested using deterministic-, probabilistic- and scenario analyses. RESULTS:   Ibrutinib showed life-time incremental health gains up to 3.99 QALYs and 5.46 life-years (LYs). The ICER was €54,264 per QALY gained versus ofatumumab and ranged between €54,833 and €67,754 versus the indirect comparators. ICERs per LY gained ranged from €40,051 to €51,196. Sensitivity analyses showed that relative treatment efficacy was the most influential model parameter. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicated ibrutinib was most cost-effective as from a willingness-to-pay threshold of €78,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS:   Ibrutinib has been shown in clinical trials to be an effective treatment for relapsed CLL patients. Based on this model and taking into consideration the high disease burden, these results suggest that ibrutinib is likely to be cost-effective for treatment of Dutch relapsed CLL patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN160

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×