COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ACUPUNCTURE VERSUS STANDARD CARE FOR PELVIC AND LOW BACK PAIN IN PREGNANCY- AN ANALYSIS OF THE GAME RANDOMIZED TRIAL
Author(s)
Butel T, Nicolian S, Durand M, Filipovic-Pierucci A, Kone M, Gambotti L, Mallet A, Durand-Zaleski I, Dommergues M
APHP, Paris, France
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Pelvic girdle and low back pain (PGLBP) is a common condition during pregnancy, resulting in poor functional score and quality of life. Its economic burden is mostly explained by indirect non-healthcare costs caused by work-time lost. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture care services for PGLBP during pregnancy. METHODS: The GAME pragmatic-open-label trial randomized 1:1 pregnant women with PGLBP from five Paris region maternity between 2012 and 2014 to receive standard care or standard care plus acupuncture (5 sessions performed by an acupuncturist midwife). The primary efficacy outcome was proportion of days with self-assessed pain <4/10. The main cost effectiveness outcome was incremental cost per day without pain. Indirect non-healthcare costs included daily compensations for sick leave and productivity loss caused by absenteeism or presenteeism. RESULTS:
Conference/Value in Health Info
2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)
Code
PSY78
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders, Reproductive and Sexual Health, Systemic Disorders/Conditions
Your browser is out-of-date
ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now