COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CRIZOTINIB AMONG ALK+ NSCLC PATIENTS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, WESTERN EUROPE, AND JAPAN

Author(s)

DiBonaventura M1, Higginbottom K2, Meyers A3, Morimoto Y4, Ilacqua J2
1Ipsos Healthcare, New York, NY, USA, 2Ipsos Healthcare, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 3Ipsos Healthcare, Washington, DC, USA, 4Ipsos Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan

OBJECTIVES:  Up to 7% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a rearrangement of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Crizotinib has been identified as a potent ALK inhibitor and has demonstrated superior efficacy in a number of clinical studies. With its recent approval, the objective of this study was to investigate crizotinib’s real-world effectiveness among ALK+ NSCLC patients across several countries. METHODS:  A multi-country retrospective medical chart-review of NSCLC patients was conducted by cancer-treating physicians in the United States (N=7,334), 5EU (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK; N=16,549), and Japan (N=3,492) between Q2 2015 and Q1 2016. Physicians randomly selected patient charts currently on an anti-cancer regimen and abstracted data on patient demographics, disease status, treatment patterns, and biomarker status. Only patients who were ALK+ were included in the analyses. Treatment response between those who had used crizotinib in their prior treatment line and control patients who had used a non-crizotinib treatment in their prior treatment line was examined using a generalized ordered logit model controlling for baseline differences. RESULTS:  A total of 1,471 patients were ALK+ and were included (crizotinib: N=336 vs. controls: N=1,135). Compared with controls, patients using crizotinib were more likely to come from Germany and Spain, to be younger, and to be passive/non-smokers (all p<.05). Patients using crizotinib were also more likely to have been diagnosed in stage IIIb/IV and have a lower ECOG score (both p<.05). Controlling for baseline differences, patients using crizotinib were significantly less likely to experience recurrence/progression (odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.24, 0.59; p<.05) and significantly more likely to experience a complete response (OR=2.65, 95%CI: 1.69, 4.15; p<.05). CONCLUSIONS:  As more ALK inhibitor treatments become available, it will be increasingly important to demonstrate the real-world effectiveness of these treatments. The results suggest a significantly better response for ALK+ patients using crizotinib.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN19

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×