USING A VALIDATED ALGORITHM TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOLOGICS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN A COMMERCIAL CLAIMS DATABASE

Author(s)

Curtis J1;Schabert VF2;Yeaw J3;Korn J4;Quach C5;Harrison DJ6;Yun H1;Joseph G*6, Collier D7 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA, 2IMS Health Consulting Group, Alexandria, VA, USA, 3IMS Health, Alexandria, VA, USA, 4IMS Health, Waltham, MA, USA, 5University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 6Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 7Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Administrative claims contain detailed medication, diagnosis, and procedure data, but their lack of clinical outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has limited their use in comparative effectiveness research.  A validated claims-based algorithm uses adherence, dosing, and treatment modifications to estimate biologics’ effectiveness (low disease or remission)  for RA. The objective was to implement this algorithm in a US managed-care database and calculate the cost per algorithm-defined responder among biologics approved for moderate to severe RA (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, abatacept). METHODS: Data were obtained from the IMS PharMetrics Plus™ Database, comprised of adjudicated medical and pharmaceutical claims for 150 million unique enrollees. The cohort included patients with RA aged 18-63, initiating treatment between January 2007 and December 2010, without RA biologics 6 months before first treatment, and enrolled between 6 months before and 12 months after first biologic. Other TNF responsive conditions were excluded. The algorithm defines lack of effectiveness as: medication possession ratio < 80% (or fewer infusions/injections than specified on US label), increase in biologic dose or frequency interval, switching biologics, adding new non-biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs, glucocorticoid use, initiation or increase of glucocorticoid dose, or > 1 parenteral or intra-articular injection during the follow-up period. Drug and administration costs were obtained from allowed amounts on claims. RESULTS: The cohort included 16,011 patients, mean age 49.3, 76.7% female. Algorithm effectiveness (low disease or remission) criteria were met in 31.0% of etanercept (n=7,247), 28.6% of  adalimumab (n=4,991), 20.2% of infliximab (n=2,352), 28.6% of abatacept (n=1,160), and 27.2% of golimumab (n=261) patients in the first 12 months of treatment. Mean first year cost per responder was lowest for etanercept ($50,141), followed by golimumab ($53,386), adalimumab ($56,941), abatacept ($73,516), and infliximab ($114,089). CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept had the highest estimated effectiveness and lowest cost per responder among first-line RA biologics using a new, validated claims-based algorithm.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PMS36

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×