USING A VALIDATED ALGORITHM TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOLOGICS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN A COMMERCIAL CLAIMS DATABASE
Author(s)
Curtis J1;Schabert VF2;Yeaw J3;Korn J4;Quach C5;Harrison DJ6;Yun H1;Joseph G*6, Collier D7 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA, 2IMS Health Consulting Group, Alexandria, VA, USA, 3IMS Health, Alexandria, VA, USA, 4IMS Health, Waltham, MA, USA, 5University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 6Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 7Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Administrative claims contain detailed medication, diagnosis, and procedure data, but their lack of clinical outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has limited their use in comparative effectiveness research. A validated claims-based algorithm uses adherence, dosing, and treatment modifications to estimate biologics’ effectiveness (low disease or remission) for RA. The objective was to implement this algorithm in a US managed-care database and calculate the cost per algorithm-defined responder among biologics approved for moderate to severe RA (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, abatacept). METHODS: Data were obtained from the IMS PharMetrics Plus™ Database, comprised of adjudicated medical and pharmaceutical claims for 150 million unique enrollees. The cohort included patients with RA aged 18-63, initiating treatment between January 2007 and December 2010, without RA biologics 6 months before first treatment, and enrolled between 6 months before and 12 months after first biologic. Other TNF responsive conditions were excluded. The algorithm defines lack of effectiveness as: medication possession ratio < 80% (or fewer infusions/injections than specified on US label), increase in biologic dose or frequency interval, switching biologics, adding new non-biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs, glucocorticoid use, initiation or increase of glucocorticoid dose, or > 1 parenteral or intra-articular injection during the follow-up period. Drug and administration costs were obtained from allowed amounts on claims. RESULTS: The cohort included 16,011 patients, mean age 49.3, 76.7% female. Algorithm effectiveness (low disease or remission) criteria were met in 31.0% of etanercept (n=7,247), 28.6% of adalimumab (n=4,991), 20.2% of infliximab (n=2,352), 28.6% of abatacept (n=1,160), and 27.2% of golimumab (n=261) patients in the first 12 months of treatment. Mean first year cost per responder was lowest for etanercept ($50,141), followed by golimumab ($53,386), adalimumab ($56,941), abatacept ($73,516), and infliximab ($114,089). CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept had the highest estimated effectiveness and lowest cost per responder among first-line RA biologics using a new, validated claims-based algorithm.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)
Code
PMS36
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders