PSYCHOMETRIC PERFORMANCE OF THE NEI VFQ-25- RASCH ANALYSIS OF THE NEI VFQ-25 AS A MEASURE OF PATIENT-REPORTED VISUAL FUNCTION ACROSS FOUR RETINAL DISEASES

Author(s)

Petrillo J*1;Ferreira A2;Cano S3;Bressler NM4, Lamoureux E5 1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 2Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 3ScaleReport, Stotfold, United Kingdom, 4John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, 5University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

OBJECTIVES: The 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) is widely used to assess patient-reported visual functioning. Previously, the reliability and validity of the NEI VFQ-25 has been assessed in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Its measurement performance in other ocular indications, and in large pooled datasets, remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the NEI VFQ-25 in a large sample of patients across multiple retinal diseases. METHODS: Dataset included pooled baseline NEI VFQ-25 data from six clinical trials in diabetic macular edema (DME), macular edema from branch and central retinal vein occlusion (RVO), neovascular AMD, and myopic choroidal neovascularisation. Rasch analysis was conducted by assessing item fit validity, threshold targeting, item dependency, reliability and stability. RESULTS: Measurement performance was evaluated for 2487 person measurements (mean age: 64±9 (SD) years; gender: 53% male). Mixed psychometric properties of the NEI VFQ-25 were identified. Key strengths identified included a high Person Separation Index of 0.93 (suggesting good reliability), predominantly low residual correlations (suggesting minimal local dependency between items), and no statistically significant Differential Item Functioning (suggesting stability of scoring function across country, study and gender). Some potential psychometric limitations of the NEI VFQ-25 included disordered thresholds for 15 of the 25 items, poor fit according to the Rasch model for several items, and mismatched distributions of person and item threshold locations. These limitations suggest sub-optimal item targeting, potential problems with conceptual clarity, lack of discrimination across some response options and a consistent ceiling effect across all indications. CONCLUSIONS: Rasch analysis of NEI VFQ-25 identified many positive characteristics of this widely used instrument. Several suboptimal characteristics, however, were also identified, suggesting that changes to the NEI VFQ-25 could be considered to improve its psychometric performance in clinical trials of retinal diseases.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PO2

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×