PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR ATTRIBUTES OF DISEASE MODIFYING THERAPIES- RESULTS OF A CHOICE BASED CONJOINT ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Wilson LS*;Loucks A;Bui CT;Gipson G;Zhong L;Tang J;Goodin D;Owen M;Waubaunt E;Cree B;Schwartzburg A;Miller E;Macedo A;Scott D, McCulloch CE University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) decrease relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Due to their wide variety of risk/ benefit attributes, patients must weigh their preferences when choosing DMTs.  We determine patient preferences for DMTs risk/benefit attributes. METHODS: Our choice-based conjoint (CBC) survey developed using Sawtooth software was given in-person, to 300 consenting adults with relapsing remitting MS at University of California, San Francisco’s MS clinic. Each patient answered 16 choice tasks. They chose one of two choices with 3-4 different levels of 6 risk and benefit attributes of hypothetical DMTs.  Benefits included delayed progression, reduced relapses, and symptom improvement. Risks were mild side effects (SEs), serious SEs, and administration route and frequency.  Analysis used mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients were 76% female; 75% with mild, 18% moderate, and 7% severe disease.  All 6 attributes significantly impacted patient preference. Of the benefits, the preferences were highest for preventing progression 10 vs 2 years (odds ratio [OR]=2.27, p<0.001) and for substantial vs no improvement in symptoms (OR=3.67, p<0.001). Patients may be willing to accept a 0.05-0.1% risk of serious SEs leading to death (OR=0.57-0.66; p<0.001) to gain a moderate to substantial benefit from their therapy. A 1% risk of serious SE compared to no risk (OR=0.22, p<0.001) resulted in very low preference, but had a comparable magnitude in preference to a substantial improvement in symptoms vs no improvement (OR=1.60, p<0.001).  Compared to daily subcutaneous administration, patients preferred daily oral administration (OR=2.15, p<0.001), then monthly intravenous (OR=1.54, p<0.001), and then intramuscular weekly (OR=1.19, p<0.01).  CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to make risk/benefit tradeoffs in medication selection. Patient prefer treatments that delay progression or improve symptoms to those that prevent relapses (the primary outcomes of many clinical trials).  Oral and monthly administration is preferred.  

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PND37

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×