IMPACT OF A VALUE-BASED COPAYMENT WAIVER BENEFIT ON MEDICATION ADHERENCE AND SPENDING

Author(s)

Gibson TB*1;Maclean R2;Carls G1;Moore BJ1;Ehrlich ED1, Baigel C3 1Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New York, NY, USA, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Most copayment waiver (value-based benefit design) programs have been applied at the individual level.  In this study we evaluate the impact of a family-based copayment waiver at a large employer. METHODS: Enrollees with diabetes in eligible health and all of their family members (regardless of health status) were automatically enrolled in a copayment waiver ($0 copay) benefit beginning January 2011 for diabetes, cardiovascular, and lipid lowering medications, screenings, and related medical services.  The study included 708 enrollees who were propensity score matched to a comparison group (total n=1416) within nine similar companies without these benefits.  An enrollee-calendar quarter panel data set was constructed from 2009-2011. Program impact was measured as the change in outcomes (medication adherence and healthcare spending) post-program in the copayment waiver group relative to the change in the comparison group (difference-in-differences). Adherence was defined as percent of days covered by a medication class greater than or equal to 80%.  A falsification test of adherence to asthma and migraine medications, where copayments did not change, was conducted. RESULTS: Prior to program implementation, enrollees in the value-based program had a similar level of adherence to diabetes medications than the comparison group (p=0.15).  After the program, percent adherent grew 29.7% over baseline (p<0.01) net of trends in the comparison group.  A smaller impact was observed for cardiovascular medications.  Total spending (employer spending plus patient out-of-pocket spending) in the value-based program group was no different than the comparison group (p=0.11).  Falsification tests of asthma and migraine medication utilization, showed no significant impact (p>.50). CONCLUSIONS: Results through the first twelve months of the program show that waiving copayments for all family members of a patient with diabetes can improve adherence to diabetes and cardiovascular services, which can lead to improvements in health outcomes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

MA1

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient Behavior and Incentives

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×