DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) INSTRUMENT FOR PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION (PAH)- THE PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION–SYMPTOMS AND IMPACT (PAH-SYMPACT) QUESTIONNAIRE
Author(s)
McCollister D1;Kummer S2;Badesch DB1;Filusch A3;Hunsche E*4;Schüler R5;Wiklund I6, Peacock A7
1University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA, 2United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA, 3HPK - Heidelberg Private Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany, 4Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Switzerland, 5Actelion Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd., London, United Kingdom, 6United BioSource Corporation, London, United Kingdom, 7Pulmonary Vascular Unit, Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVES: In the absence of any pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific PRO instruments developed in accordance with 2009 FDA guidance requirements, this qualitative research study was conducted to develop a new instrument assessing PAH symptoms and their impacts following the PRO guidance. METHODS: Patient inclusion criteria were age 18–80 years and symptomatic PAH (WHO Group 1) diagnosed by right-heart catheterization. Concept elicitation was based on 5 focus groups, after which saturation of emergent concepts was reached. A PRO instrument for PAH symptoms and their impacts was drafted, considering input from the international Steering Committee as well as translatability and legibility assessments. Two rounds of cognitive interviews on the draft PRO were conducted, with instrument revisions following each. The study was approved by institutional review boards at 5 US sites and participants provided written informed consent. RESULTS: Focus groups comprised 25 patients, and 20 additional patients participated in cognitive interviews (10 per round). Participants had a mean±SD age of 54±16 years, were predominantly female (91%), and were diverse in race/ethnicity, WHO functional class (FC I/II: 51%, III/IV: 49%), and etiology (associated PAH: 51%, idiopathic PAH: 47%, familial PAH: 2%). The draft PRO instrument was found to be clear, comprehensive, and relevant to PAH patients in cognitive interviews. Items were organized in a draft conceptual framework with 4 symptom domains (respiratory symptoms, tiredness, cardiovascular symptoms, other symptoms) and 5 impact domains (physical activities, daily activities, social impact, cognition, emotional impact). The recall period is the past 24 hours for symptom items, and 7 days for impact items. CONCLUSIONS: The draft instrument was shown to capture symptoms and their impacts relevant to PAH patients, demonstrating content saturation and concept validity. Additional testing is needed to confirm the content and psychometric validity of the PAH-SYMPACT before use in future clinical practice or studies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)
Code
PRM120
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, PRO & Related Methods
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic