COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH BREAKTHROUGH PAIN IN CANCER PATIENTS- FINDINGS FROM THE NATIONAL BREAKTHROUGH PAIN SURVEY

Author(s)

Narayana A1;Katz N2;Shillington AC*3;Stephenson JJ4;Frye C3, Portenoy R5 1Teva Pharmaceuticals, Frazer, PA, USA, 2Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Analgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA, 3EPI-Q, Inc., Oak Brook, IL, USA, 4HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA, 5Department of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate medical and pharmacy costs associated with breakthrough pain (BTP) in a commercially-insured population with chronic, cancer-related pain. METHODS: The National Breakthrough Pain Survey studied a large commercially-insured population using claims data and structured interviews to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and impact of BTP. Adult patients with ≥2 medical claims at an interval ≥3 months with an ICD-9-CM code indicating a chronic pain condition (cancer or noncancer) and ≥3 opioid prescription claims consistent with chronic use were eligible. Patients were called and interviewed after providing consent; those verifying cancer pain were included in this sub-analysis. All-cause medical and pharmacy costs in 2010 US dollars were determined from administrative claims data for the 12-month period before the survey date. Generalized linear models with gamma distribution were constructed because of the skewed nature of the cost data. RESULTS: A total of 2198 patients were interviewed, 1279 had controlled persistent pain, and 145 of the latter group had cancer pain. Of those with cancer pain, BTP was reported by 77.2% (BTP, 112; no BTP, 33). Mean (SD) total annual healthcare costs for patients with and without BTP were $84,049 ($129,279) and $77,926 ($98,785), respectively. Costs in patients with BTP were 28.6% higher than patients without BTP (P=0.3211) after controlling for health plan, patient demographics, comorbidities, history of prior surgery, neuropathic pain, baseline pain severity, treatment by a pain specialist, and patient-reported pain interference. Mean (SD) total annual pharmacy costs for patients with BTP were $20,088 ($35,406) versus $9,939 ($9,715) for patients without BTP. Patients with BTP had pharmacy costs that were 81.7% higher than patients without BTP (P=0.0265) after controlling for the above variables. CONCLUSIONS: In a commercially-insured population, cancer patients with controlled, persistent pain and BTP had higher total health care and pharmacy costs than cancer patients with controlled, persistent pain without BTP.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PSY26

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×