COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POSACONAZOLE VERSUS FLUCONAZOLE/ ITRACONAZOLE IN THE PREVENTION OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS AMONG HIGH-RISK NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS IN SINGAPORE
Author(s)
Fust K*1;Weinstein MC2;Gomez-Rey G1;Xie Y3;Hsu TY4;Pawar V5;Hsu LY6;Tan BH7, O'Sullivan AK8
1OptumInsight, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 3Merck & Co., White house Station, NJ, USA, 4MSD Pharma (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore, 5Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 6National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 7Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 8IMS Health, Waltham, MA, USA
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole/ itraconazole in invasive fungal infection (IFI) prevention among patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and at high risk of IFI due to chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in Singapore. METHODS: A decision-analytic model previously developed for the US and other countries was adapted to Singapore, to estimate the cost-effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole compared to fluconazole/ itraconazole among AML or MDS patients at high risk of IFI. Patients were assumed to receive prophylaxis with posaconazole or fluconazole/ itraconazole. Probabilities of IFI, IFI-related death, and other cause death within 100 days of follow-up were estimated from clinical trial data. Trial results were extended to a lifetime horizon by modeling cancer-specific mortality, estimated from published sources, in one-month Markov cycles. Prophylaxis and IFI treatment costs were estimated using data obtained from two hospitals in Singapore. Model outputs include total costs (Singapore dollars (SGD); 1 SGD=0.82 USD), IFIs avoided, life-years saved, and incremental cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole/ itraconazole. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted, where probabilities of IFI, IFI-related death, and 100-day other cause mortality were assigned beta distributions from trial data. RESULTS: Total costs of prophylaxis with fluconazole/ itraconazole and posaconazole were SGD 4,475 and SGD 4,999, respectively. Corresponding health outcomes were 0.11 and 0.05 IFIs and 2.44 and 2.51 life-years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for posaconazole were SGD 8,150 per IFI avoided and SGD 7,526 per life-year saved. Posaconazole was cost-effective compared to fluconazole/ itraconazole in 94% of PSA simulations at a threshold of SGD 80,000 (commonly cited threshold in Singapore). CONCLUSIONS: Use of posaconazole in place of fluconazole/ itraconazole for prevention of IFIs in a high-risk neutropenic population is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SGD 80,000 per life-year saved in Singapore.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)
Code
PCN62
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic