COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIRECT COST STUDIES ON ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS (AS) IN TURKEY

Author(s)

Pay S1, Malhan S*2 1Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey, 2Baskent University, Ankara , Turkey

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare the direct cost parameters on ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by using two studies in Turkey conducted via patient database record system and via expert opinion methodology in 2010. METHODS: The data included in this study was collected upon the opinions of 22 rheumatologists from 53 clinics in Turkey. The other study was completed by Turkish Health Insurance Funds Database (THIFD) --1920 patients selected for a 6-month period. RESULTS: Based on the patient database, 7% of patients were hospitalized and 46% had at least one outpatient visit. According to expert opinion, 8.2% of the patients were hospitalized and 66% had outpatient visit. Patient records state that non-COX inhibitors (71%), and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (35%), are prescribed. Based on the rheumatologists, non-COX inhibitors (81.37%) and immunosuppressant (7.52%), methotrexate (13.21%), sulfasalazine (40.24%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (81.37%) and biologic DMARDs (24.95%) were prescribed. Total annual cost (EUR€4,233) results of the patient database comprised of pharmacy costs (EUR€3,760), outpatient costs (EUR€297), and inpatient costs (EUR€155). Annual cost from expert opinion was EUR€3,565.91, with outpatient and inpatient costs (EUR€239.57), and pharmacy and prostheses/orthoses cost (EUR€3,326.33). CONCLUSIONS: Expert panel methodology’s important way to observe the real world practice. It’s observed that expert panel and patient database results are in line with each other. Due to the distribution of the pharmaceuticals, a difference of only EUR€239.58 was found. It can be observed that biologic DMARDs treatments are perceived to be prescribed more, however according to patient data, the prescribed ratio of biologic DMARDs is relatively low. THIFD is used to extract patient costs where patient records are used for controlling reimbursement criteria so some of the data may be misleading. Accurate performing of coding is key issue to minimize possible bias in use of patient data.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PHS14

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×