ASSESSING HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL) IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (MDD)- DO COMMONLY USED INSTRUMENTS MEET EMA REQUIREMENTS FOR PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND CONTENT RELEVANCE
Author(s)
Danchenko N*1;Rive B2;Pendlebury S3, Abetz L4 1Lundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux , France, 2Lundbeck S.A.S., Issy-Les Moulineaux, France, 3Mediplex Ltd, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVES: The impact of MDD on HRQOL is well documented, but little information exists about commonly used HRQoL instruments’ adherence to EMA requirements for psychometric properties and content relevance. This work examines commonly used HRoQL instruments for their relevance to MDD, based on their content, concepts measured and psychometric properties, and use in published MDD studies. METHODS: A qualitative research paper provided a conceptual model for MDD (1). The SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), Health Status Questionnaire-12 (HSQ-12) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) were mapped to this conceptual model to examine their relevance to MDD. The measures’ reliability, validity, responsiveness to change in depression and use in MDD trials and labelling were examined through review of classic databases (including: PROQOLID, PROLABEL, MEDLINE, PSYCHINFO, FDA, EMA). Where no information on MDD was available, data for mood disorders were explored. RESULTS: The SF-36, SDS, Q-LES-Q and EQ-5D have been widely used in MDD, with SDS and Q-LES-Q results included as part of approved EMA labelling claims in mood disorder indications. These instruments are clinically well established and the combination covers HRQoL concepts relevant to the MDD population [emotional/social/physical (specifically bodily pain)]; Q-LES-Q and SF-36 are the most comprehensive HRQoL measures. All instruments met EMA psychometric requirements for validity, reliability and responsiveness to changes in depressive symptoms and in elderly populations for the HSQ-12. Furthermore, the instruments have been linguistically validated for use in many countries. CONCLUSIONS: These commonly used instruments are relevant to MDD and meet EMA criteria for reliability, validity and responsiveness. Thus, we conclude that these instruments are appropriate for use in clinical programmes to assess the impact of MDD treatment on HRQoL and overall functioning, particularly to support claims in Europe.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)
Code
PMH52
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Mental Health