A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF LINEZOLID VS VANCOMYCIN FOR VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA PATIENTS IN HONDURAS

Author(s)

Lutz MA1;Alvarado T2;Bogantes JP1, Cuesta G*3 1Pfizer Central America and the Caribbean, San Jose, Costa Rica, 2Centro de Cáncer Emma Romero de Calleja, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, 3Pfizer Central America and the Caribbean, Escazú, San Jose, Costa Rica

OBJECTIVES: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit (ICU). It’s associated with significant morbidity, increasing the ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and raising overall costs.  Literature suggests that costs could be reduced using the most efficient empiric therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of linezolid against generic vancomycin as an empiric therapy for VAP patients, from the healthcare payer’s perspective.   METHODS: A decision-tree model was used to compare costs and effectiveness of linezolid (600 mg/12 hours) and vancomycin (1g / 12 hours) (comparator) for a cohort of patients with VAP. Effectiveness measures were: microbiological success rates, mortality rates, ICU and ward LOS and overall costs. Effectiveness and epidemiologic data were collected from published literature. Local costs (2012 US$) were obtained from Honduras´ Ministry of Health official databases (11). The model used a 12-week time horizon and only direct medical costs were considered (hospital LOS, medication costs, hematologic, gastrointestinal and skin adverse events and lab exams). Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was constructed.  RESULTS: Results showed linezolid as more effective and less expensive option for VAP. Clinical success rate was higher with linezolid (64.4%) against vancomicyn, (56.1%).  Mortality was lower with linezolid (10.13% vs 15.74%).  Average ICU (and ward) LOS was 18 (9) days with linezolid and 22 (10) days with vancomycin.  Overall medical costs per patient were $22,825.45 with linezolid and $26,227.26 with vancomycin. CE analyses showed linezolid is the dominant strategy.  Acceptability curves showed that linezolid would be cost-effective within <3 GDP per capita threshold.  PSA outcomes support the robustness of these findings.  CONCLUSIONS: This is the first CE study for VAP developed in Honduras. Linezolid resulted as the cost-saving option for treating VAP patients in the Honduran clinical environment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PRS18

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×