US RRMS PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TREATMENTS- AN ONLINE SURVEY

Author(s)

Mansfield CA1, Thomas N2, Gebben D1, Lucas M1
1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To estimate patient preferences for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treatments METHODS: Patients in the United States who reported receiving a diagnosis of MS from their physician completed a Web-based discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey that included questions on treatment experience and adherence. The survey presented 10 DCE questions in which respondents were asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical MS treatment profiles. The profile attributes of the treatments were informed by a literature search and clinician input, and tested in patient interviews. Attributes included: change in MS progression and years between relapses; risk of serious infection; delivery method and frequency of administration; and chance of flu-like and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. The profiles in the DCE questions were based on an experimental design with known statistical properties. Random-parameters logit was used to estimate preferences. RESULTS: The sample included 301 patients with RRMS: 81% were female; mean age was 54 years; 56% rated their disability level as “normal” or “mild”; and 79% reported currently receiving a prescription MS treatment. Nineteen percent reported stopping or skipping treatment doses due to flu-like symptoms and 9% due to GI symptoms. Respondents placed the greatest decision weight on reducing the chance of MS progression and risk of serious infection, as well as on the mode and frequency of administration. Followed by daily pills, an intravenous (IV) administration every 6 months was preferred over IV every month and injections 3 times per week (P < 0.05). Respondents reported being most likely to adhere to either daily pills or IV administration every 6 months (39% and 29% of patients, respectively).  CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RRMS reported that treatment preferences were influenced by efficacy, reduced side effects, and less burdensome modes of administration. Side effects and mode of administration also influenced reported likelihood of treatment adherence.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PND71

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×