SELECTION OF STATISTICAL APPROACH IN UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF CONTRAST MEDIA IN INPATIENT INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURES

Author(s)

David G1, Johnson M2, Lim L3, Mallow PJ4
1The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK, 3GE Healthcare, Marlborough, MA, USA, 4CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Cincinnati, OH, USA

OBJECTIVES: The decision to utilize a particular product may depend on formal hospital guidelines, physician practice patterns, negotiated reimbursement schedules with insurance companies, and other local (geographic and/or hospital) characteristics. These elements are mostly unobservable for the purpose of statistical inference. A hospital fixed-effects model specification, in essence, controls for unobservable within-hospital time-invariant characteristics. Focusing on the relationship between iso-osmolar contrast media (CM) and low-osmolar CM agents (LOCM) and renal failure events in patients undergoing inpatient interventional procedures, this study highlights the importance of controlling for such factors by comparing statistical specifications with and without hospital fixed-effects. METHODS: The Premier database was used to identify patients between January 2008 and September 2013. Eligible patients had a primary procedure of angioplasty defined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) and/or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes, inpatient admission, and LOCM or iso-osmolar CM agent. Renal failure during the visit was determined by ICD-9 diagnosis codes. Two different statistical approaches were employed to assess the relationship between renal failure and CM use – Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) cross-sectional and hospital fixed-effects model specification. RESULTS: A total of 385,290 interventional procedure visits met the inclusion criteria. The unadjusted univariate analysis showed 1.7% (p<0.01) more renal events in the iso-osmolar CM cohort compared to LOCM. The most saturated (OLS) cross-sectional analysis showed 1.4% (p<0.01) fewer renal events in the iso-osmolar CM cohort compared to patients who received LOCM. Controlling for unobserved heterogeneity across hospitals using the most saturated hospital fixed-effect specification, we found 2.3% (p < 0.01) fewer renal failure events with iso-osmolar CM. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated the importance of controlling for observable and for unobservable, within-hospital time invariant characteristics through a hospital fixed-effects specification when the decision-making factors for selection of CM may vary from hospital to hospital.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PRM3

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×