PUBLIC HEALTH AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF QUADRIVALENT INFLUENZA VACCINE IN PANAMA
Author(s)
Jamotte A1, Caicedo Navas AG2, Macabeo B3, Lopez JG4, Moreno B5, Franco D5, Garcia LN6, Isaza de Molto Y6
1Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France, 2Sanofi Pasteur, Bogota, Colombia, 3Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France, 4Sanofi Pasteur, Mexico City, Mexico, 5Gorgas Memorial Institute for Health Studies, Panama City, Panama, 6Panama Ministry of Health, Panama City, Panama
OBJECTIVES: Annual trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) containing three influenza strains (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and one B) have been recommended in Panama since 2006. However, worldwide co-circulation of two distinct B lineages (Victoria and Yamagata) and difficulties in predicting which lineage will predominate in the next season have led to the development of quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) including both B lineages. Our analysis evaluates the public health and economic benefits of using QIV versus TIV in Panama from 2006 to 2013. METHODS: A static model published by Reed et al. in 2012 was adapted to Panama and stratified by age group. In addition, B-lineage cross-protection was included based on published sources. We calculated the hypothetical impact of QIV compared with TIV over seven influenza seasons (2009 pandemic year excluded) using virologic circulation, vaccine coverage, vaccine effectiveness and attack rate. In absence of B-lineage distribution in Panama, Brazilian data were considered. For influenza-related outcomes (outpatient visits, hospitalisations, deaths), two sets of inputs were used. Influenza-related costs were estimated from societal perspective in Panamanian balboas (1 per US dollar). RESULTS: Over the 2006-2013 period, QIV would have prevented 7,519 influenza B cases compared with TIV, averting between 2,756 and 5,564 outpatients visits, between 28 and 2,202 hospitalisations and between 6 and 930 deaths. This translates into influenza-related avoided costs of between 137 and 3,599 thousand balboas. In 2012, year with high B circulation and mismatch, QIV would have avoided 5,256 cases, 3,889 outpatient visits, 1,539 hospitalisations, 650 deaths and 2.5 million balboas of influenza-related costs in the upper bound. CONCLUSIONS: The wider protection offered by QIV would reduce the number of influenza infections and its related complications, leading to influenza-related costs avoided. Herd effect was not taken into account, underestimating the benefits of QIV vaccination. More robust local data are needed to better assess benefits of QIV.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PIN80
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)