LONGITUDINAL MODELING OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LISDEXAMFETAMINE DIMESYLATE AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN ADULTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE BINGE EATING DISORDER
Author(s)
Pawaskar M1, Ágh T2, Radewonuk J1, Vokó Z2, McElroy SL3, Herman BK1, Gasior M1
1Shire, Wayne, PA, USA, 2Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary, 3Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, OH, USA
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with protocol-defined moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED). METHODS: In 2 identically designed 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, adults with protocol-defined moderate to severe binge eating (BE) who met DSM-IV-TR BED criteria were randomized (study 1, N=383; study 2, N=390) to placebo or LDX (50 or 70 mg). HRQoL was assessed at baseline and treatment weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12/early termination using the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L; a prespecified secondary endpoint). For this post hoc analysis, participant EQ-5D-5L profiles were converted to utility index scores (range: –0.109 [worst state] to 1 [best state]) and pooled across studies. Unadjusted and adjusted random effect tobit regressions were conducted to examine the longitudinal relationship between LDX treatment and HRQoL. RESULTS: Mean ± SD EQ-5D-5L index scores in the pooled treatment groups were 0.877±0.105 for placebo (n=358 observations) and 0.882±0.118 for LDX (n=364 observations) at baseline and 0.909±0.115 for placebo (n=296 observations) and 0.933±0.102 for LDX (n=302 observations) at week 12. Mean (95% CI) improvement/week in EQ-5D-5L index scores without adjustment was statistically significant for placebo (0.0059 [0.005, 0.007]; P<0.001) and for LDX relative to placebo (0.0032 [0.001, 0.005]; P=0.001). Treatment effects on HRQoL were no longer significant after adjusting for BE episodes/week, functionality, and impairment in work and daily activities (placebo, –0.0001 [–0.002, 0.002], P=0.9; LDX relative to placebo, 0.0006 [–0.002, 0.003], P=0.6) or after adjusting for BE days/week, functionality, and impairment in work and daily activities (placebo, –0.0008 [–0.003, 0.002], P=0.5; LDX relative to placebo, 0.0002 [–0.002, 0.003], P=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The positive effect of LDX on HRQoL/patient utlility is indirect and mediated in part by LDX effects on BE frequency and disability/functioning.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PMH5
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Mental Health