ECONOMIC STUDY DESIGN FOR THE OPTIMIZE STUDY ON ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY AND DRUG-COATED BALLOON DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF BELOW-THE-KNEE PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE

Author(s)

Martinsen BJ1, Weber SA2, Pietzsch ML2, Behrens A1, Weatherspoon M1, Igyarto Z1, Zhao R3, Kotlarz H1, Pietzsch JB4
1Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA, 2Cellogic GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 3University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 4Wing Tech Inc., Irvine, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Present the economic study design of the OPTIMIZE study on orbital atherectomy system (OAS) and drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients. Treating patients with calcified peripheral arterial lesions can be challenging and costly. The impact of OAS and DCBs in treating calcified lesions has been studied independently. The objective of this study design is to assess the economic impact of treating below-the-knee (BTK) calcified PAD lesions with OAS+DCB compared to treating BTK calcified lesions with DCB alone (without OAS). METHODS: This prospective, multi-center, post-market pilot study comparing OAS with adjunctive DCB angioplasty versus DCB angioplasty alone for treatment of calcified BTK lesions is a 1:1 randomized controlled study of 50 patients with calcification. In addition to clinical outcomes, health economic outcomes will be collected for the index procedure as well as additional procedures required during the clinical follow-up period. RESULTS: Health economic outcomes will be measured at the index procedure, at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post procedure for the treatment of PAD and its complications (repeat procedures, amputations, etc.). Health-related quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D instrument. Resource utilization will be collected from case report forms and hospital accounting systems, using site-specific procedure code information of relevant OPS (German sites), CHOP (Swiss sites), and MEL codes (Austrian sites). Analyses from the third-party payer perspective will be informed by country-specific reimbursement amounts, using Germany as the initial reference case. Resulting cost difference and incremental cost-effectiveness are the main economic outcomes targeted in this analysis.   CONCLUSIONS: Prospective inclusion of health-economic endpoints in clinical trials for PAD is important to support future decision-making by payers and providers. The OPTIMIZE study collects targeted information on quality of life and resource utilization to facilitate future health-economic analyses.  

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PRM230

Topic

Study Approaches

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×