BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN GREECE

Author(s)

Tzanetakos C1, Vassilopoulos D2, Kourlaba G3, Christou P4, Maniadakis N1
1National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece, 2University of Athens Medical School, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece, 3Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), Athens, Greece, 4UCB Pharma, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incremental total and per-patient budget impact of adopting certolizumab pegol (CZP) for the recently indicated treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Greece. METHODS: A budget impact model was adapted from a third-party payer perspective (EOPYY) to delineate the financial implications of introducing CZP for the treatment of PsA alongside currently indicated biologic treatments, namely etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and ustekinumab, over the next 5 years (2014–2018). The model framework considered market share scenarios with and without CZP, and directly reimbursed costs of treatment and disease management, applied to the prevalent and eligible Greek patient population. Quarterly treatment discontinuation was geared to enable tracking of patients, so that the model could apply different costs to patients at different stages of treatment. Costs pertaining to drug acquisition, administration and monitoring were included for both the induction and maintenance years of patients’ treatment and corresponded to current costing year. Resource unit costs and epidemiological data were retrieved from officially published sources. The measured outcomes were incremental costs per treated patient per year (PTPPY) and total budget impact, calculated by comparing the respective patient and total budget expenditures with and without CZP in the market share mix scenarios. RESULTS: The incremental total and PTPPY costs resulting from the addition of CZP to the original treatment mix were estimated at -€2,036,848 (-1.76%) and -€859 respectively, over a 5-year time horizon. On average, annual cost-savings of €407,370 (-1.76%) and €172 were observed for both outcomes respectively. In each model, yearly cost-savings were yielded and 2018 was the year with the highest total cost-savings for EOPYY (€512,296 [-2.2%]). Cost-savings were driven by reduced drug and administration costs. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of CZP for active PsA treatment was predicted to be associated with short- and long-term cost-savings in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PMS29

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×