AN IN SILICO HEALTH ECONOMIC MODEL APPLIED TO CRYOPYRIN ASSOCIATED PERIODIC SYNDROMES (CAPS)- COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PREVENTION EFFECTS OF ULTRA-ORPHAN DRUGS FOR RARE DISEASES
Author(s)
Trieste L1, Della Casa Alberighi O2, Accame L2, Lorenzoni V1, Frenkel J3, Gattorno M2, Quartier P4, Martini A2, Turchetti G1
1Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy, 2Institute Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy, 3University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 4Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de ParisHopital Necker, Paris, France
OBJECTIVES: This three-year, international, multicentre, longitudinal, observational, cost-effectiveness study named RaDiCEA (RareDisease &Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis) will assess the economic evaluation (cost of illness - COI and cost-effectiveness analisys - CEA) of innovative therapies (i.e., anti IL-1 agents), quality of life (QoL) and effects of the prevention of otherwise irreversible central nervous system, eye, ear, kidney, and cartilage damages of different treatment strategies for cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) of adults and children. METHODS: A virtual time-cohort approach and a Markov model simulating health states corresponding to different CAPS severity will be developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of either anti IL-1 agents or other than anti IL-1. Due to the lack of a CAPS-specific severity index/damage score, a linear combination of existing indexes and damage scores related to specific organs and systems will be used to rank patient’s health statu. Coefficients of the resulting function will be assigned following a top-down (Delphi) approach and an interim-ex post principal component analysis. The model quantifies resource utilization for patients’ care in the National Health Systems’ perspectives and a broader societal perspective. QoL will be evaluated using EQ-5D questionnaires. Robustness of outcomes wil be tested through univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The RaDiCEA project will assess the long-term effectiveness of different potentially life-long treatment strategies and COI, while exploring the feasibility of a new CEA model to be generated from a rare disease (CAPS) observational study. The economic outcomes will be given as the number of years spent in each health state, the related yearly costs and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The importance and novelty of the model is twofold: i) in its application, adopting the cost-effectiveness approach for assessing the impact of CAPS therapies, and ii) in the methods, extending the analyses of the impact of CAPS therapies in reducing the speed of disease progression.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PSY60
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Rare and Orphan Diseases