A NEW COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODELLING APPROACH IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION
Author(s)
McMurray JJ1, Cowie MR2, Cohen AA3, Briggs A1, de Pouvourville G4, Taylor M5, Hancock E6, Trueman D7, Mumby-Croft J6, Haroun R8, Deschaseaux C8
1University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, 2Imperial College London, London, UK, 3Hôpital saint Antoine, Paris, France, 4ESSEC Business School, Cergy-Pontoise, France, 5York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK, 6Abacus International, Oxfordshire, UK, 7Abacus International, Bicester, UK, 8Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES: As new therapies for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) emerge, health technology assessments (HTAs) will require cost-effectiveness analyses to inform decision making. The objective was to develop a model framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of LCZ696, a novel oral therapy proposed for the treatment of HFrEF. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, and Cochrane Library databases, with supplementary hand searching of conferences and HTA websites. Of 63 distinct analyses identified, 33 used decision-analytic models. Structures were most commonly described as Markov models (n=27), but methods employed were heterogeneous. The health states most frequently employed were ‘alive’ and ‘dead’, with outcomes such as hospitalization or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class distribution most commonly considered within the ‘alive’ state. RESULTS: A 2-state Markov model with ‘alive’ and ‘dead’ states was developed using three multivariate regression models to predict the risks of mortality, hospitalisation and the trajectory of health-related quality of life over time within the ‘alive’ state. NYHA class was not used as a basis for health states, as the extrapolation of clinical improvements beyond the observed data was considered clinically implausible. Parametric survival models, negative binomial models and multilevel models are used to predict mortality, hospitalisation, and HRQL, respectively, allowing extrapolation to a lifetime time horizon. The model of HRQL attempts to capture the effects of baseline characteristics, hospitalisation, adverse events and time on EQ-5D. Clinical experts were consulted to validate the regression models and their respective predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The new framework employs similar methods to decision analytic models developed previously in heart failure, however models health-related quality of life as a function of time directly, thereby providing a parsimonious approach with improved clinical plausibility compared to other model structures in the literature.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PCV118
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic