RATES AND COSTS OF HOSPITALIZATION IN OBESE PATIENTS WITH BARIATRIC SURGERY
Author(s)
Lao WL1, Chia J2, Globe D21University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the health care resource utilization and costs between obese patients who received laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (lRYGB), open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (oRYGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: Marketscan claims data (2005 to 2010) were analyzed for patients ≥18 years old, who received LAGB, lRYGB, oRYGB, or SG (identified using ICD-9-CM and CPT codes) and remained continuously insured for ≥12 months following first date of surgery (index date). Patients with ambiguous bariatric procedure coding or stomach or intestinal cancer codes were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 52,359 claims met inclusion criteria: LAGB (n=21,075), lRYGB (n=26,206), oRYGB (n=4,497), and SG (n=581), averaging 44 to 46 years old and about 80% female. 35.5% LAGB had type II diabetes codes compared to lRYGB (40.6%), oRYGB (42.3%), and SG (40.8%). 10.0% of the LAGB patients were hospitalized within 12 months post-index date compared to lRYGB (17.4%), oRYGB (20.5%), and SG (13.8%). LOS were 4.9, 6.0, 9.3, and 10.0 days; total costs were $21,242 vs. $22,988; $31,603; and $35,631; respectively. In the diabetic subgroup, 12.1% LAGB, 19.2% lRYGB, 23.9% oRYGB, and 17.3% SG were hospitalized within 12 months. LOS were 5.4, 6.4, 10.4, and 11.3 days; total costs were $22,840; $24,816; $37,698; and $35,128; respectively. Similarly, out of those with 36-month follow-up data, 29.0% (1162/4012) LAGB patients were hospitalized compared to 36.5% (3000/8218) lRYGB, 41.0% (852/2078) oRYGB, and 13.8% (79/234) SG. LOS were 5.4, 6.6, 7.6, and 6.4 days, respectively; and total costs were $24,973 (LAGB); $27,280 (lRYGB); $26,754 (oRYGB); and $26,948 (SG). CONCLUSIONS: LAGB had the lowest all-cause hospitalization rate and costs during follow-up periods and within the diabetic subgroup. Results, however, could be due to other factors like baseline imbalances; further research will assess if trend remains after stratifying for differences in underlying comorbidities.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA
Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)
Code
PSU34
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders