COST EFFECTIVENESS MODEL- COMPARISON OF CLOSED INCISION MANAGEMENT USING NEGATIVE PRESSURE AND STANDARD OF CARE OVER CLEAN CLOSED INCISIONS BASED ON A 2012 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Author(s)

Mullins A, Paulos MKinetic Concepts Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: Wound complications following surgical procedures are a significant cost burden to the health care system and have been identified as one of the hospital-acquired infections not reimbursed by payers. Surgical site infections have been associated with both an increased hospital stay of 9.58 extra days and $38,656 in additional medical charges, and postoperative dehiscence can add as much as 9.42 extra days, resulting in $40,323 in additional charges.  A health economic model was developed to demonstrate potential cost savings associated with using closed incision management (CIM*) to apply negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over clean closed surgical incisions in patients treated for an open fracture of the tibia and fibula.   METHODS: The hypothetical economic model applied national cost dollars to clinical outcomes of the Stannard et al randomized controlled trial (RCT) using NPWT† over closed incisions. National cost data (Thomson Reuters custom report) were selected using the diagnosis codes related to the population of patients within the Stannard et al RCT, which were open fracture of the tibia and fibula with complications such as infection and dehiscence (ICD9 79.36). The infection rates (10%, 14/141 patients NPWT and 19%, 23/122 patients Control [standard of care], p=0.049) and dehiscence rates (8.6%, 12/141 NPWT and 16.5%, 20/122 Control, p=0.044) were calculated from the Stannard et al RCT and were applied to a hypothetical 100 patient population (50 CIM and 50 Control). RESULTS: Reduced infection and dehiscence rates in this patient population resulted in potential per patient cost savings of $5338 for infection and $1586 for dehiscence with CIM. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the potential cost effectiveness of CIM over closed incisions of high-risk fractures.  *Prevena™ Incision Management System and †V.A.C. Therapy; KCI USA, Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)

Code

PMD34

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Pediatrics, Reproductive and Sexual Health, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×