COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN COLOMBIA

Author(s)

Nuñez SM1, Godoy JI2, Cardona AF3, Otero JM3, Lujan M4, Lopera D5, Carranza H6, Spath A7, Gis PR11Pfizer Colombia, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 2 Hospital Militar Central, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 3Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 4Clínica de Oncología Astorga and Facultad Medicina (Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana), Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, 5Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Oncologos del Occidente  S.A, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia, 6Clinica del Country, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 7Pfizer S.L.U, Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal tumor and accounts for 2 to 3% of all adult malignancies. Up to 30% of patients with renal-cell carcinoma present with metastatic disease. The aim of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line medications for patients with metastatic RCC from the payerʼs perspective. METHODS:  A Markov model was developed using 6-week cycles for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of four mRCC first-line therapies: Interferon-α (3 million units (MU)/day 3 times-per-week for first week; 6MU/day 3 times-per-week for second week, 9MU/day 3 times per-week third week onward), sunitinib (50mg/day 4 weeks ON + 2 weeks OFF), sorafenib (400mg/twice-a-day) and bevacizumab plus Interferon α (10mg/kg/bi-weekly + 9MU 3 times-per-week every 3 weeks). The model had a 10-year time horizon. The four model stages were: No progression, progression, best supportive care and death. Effectiveness data were obtained through a systematic review, resource utilization were collected from a Colombian Delphi Panel, and costs included were retrieved from Colombian tariff manual (SOAT).  Effectiveness was measured by progression-free life years (PFLY) and life-years gained (LYG). Costs and outcomes were discounted with a 3% annual rate. Univariate sensitivity analysis was developed.  RESULTS:  Sunitinib showed higher overall mean costs per patient (US$ 5,215.48) compared to interferon; while comparing against sorafenib and bevacizumab + interferon sunitinib costs per patient revealed to be lower in US$12,946.01 and US$ 102,780.16 respectively. Sunitinib had the higher effectiveness results: 1.35 PFLY, 2.9 LYG and 1.87 QALY. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis shows sunitinib is cost-saving compared to sorafenib and to the combination of bevacizumab + interferon, and compared to monotherapy with interferon the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per LYG for sunitinib was US$12,099, per PFLY was US$8,381 and per QALY was US$14,901. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that sunitinib represents the most cost-effective option for first-line mRCC treatment in Colombia.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)

Code

PCN62

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×