WHAT IS THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE STRATEGY FOR TREATING CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA AFTER IMATINIB LOSES PATENT EXCLUSIVITY IN EUROPE?

Author(s)

Padula WV1, Conti R2, Larson R1
1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2University of Chicago, Chicago, GA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of treating all chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with imatinib initially compared to physician-choice between imatinib or the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dasatinib or nilotinib. Imatinib will lose patent exclusivity between 2015-2016 and its price is expected to drop 60-90% within one year throughout Europe.   METHODS: A Markov model simulating “step-therapy” compared to “physician-choice” in treating CML in 2015 through 5 years. The model assumes a European societal perspective. In both approaches, if initial treatment fails, patients are switched to a second-generation TKI. Patients are assumed to switch if they fail to meet efficacy endpoints: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or major molecular response (MMR). The model assumes stabilized prices of second-generation TKIs, but discounts the price of imatinib: 100% for first 6-months; 60-80% for second 6-months; and 10-30% thereafter. For each drug, tolerance, efficacy and the probabilities of treatment choice, switching and failure were drawn from published clinical trials. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were based on U.K. preference weights (Szabo et al. 2010). According to Hoyle et al. (2011), direct medical costs per patient were: £20,244 for imatinib; and ~£30,000 for dasatinib and nilotinib. Additional costs included patient monitoring and allogeneic transplantation. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% (British Pounds Sterling (£); 2013). Sensitivity analyses tested parameters for impact on results at a willingness-to-pay of £50,000/QALY.   RESULTS: Step-therapy costs less and offers clinically-equivalent utility (£62,388; 2.864 QALYs) compared to physician-choice (£71,268; 2.879 QALYs), at an ICER of £592,000/QALY. The results are robust to changes based on univariate analyses of each parameter. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses found step-therapy cost-effective in 99.9% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.   CONCLUSIONS: When imatinib loses patient protection between 2015-2016 throughout Europe, it will be the cost-effective initial treatment strategy for CML compared to second-generation TKIs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN126

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×