THE EFFECT OF HERD IMMUNITY IN DIFFERENT HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION STRATEGIES- AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE BEST II STUDY

Author(s)

Haeussler K1, Marcellusi A2, Mennini FS3, Favato G4, Picardo M5, Garganese G6, Bononi M2, Scambia G6, Capone A7, Baio G1
1University College London, London, UK, 2University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 3University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy, Rome, Italy, 4Kingston University, Kingston, UK, Kingston, UK, 5San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Rome, Italy, 6Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, 7Kingston University London, London, UK

OBJECTIVES Italian recommendations for human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization programmes currently target females only. However, males can be vectors in virus transmission and are at risk of disease infection. The BEST II study was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of different interventions targeting females as well as males, and the economic impact of vaccination on a wide range of HPV-induced diseases. METHODS A dynamic Bayesian Markov model was developed to investigate HPV transmission between sexual partners and the cost-effectiveness of several HPV vaccination strategies. Both sexes were included in a universal vaccination programme which was compared to screening-only and female-only vaccination. A range of HPV-induced diseases was considered (cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, head/neck and penile cancer, the associated pre-cancerous stages as well as anogenital warts). The process of sexual mixing was estimated based on age-, gender- and sexual behavioural-specific factors to estimate the force of infection dynamically. The degree of susceptibility to the virus, associated with early sexual debut, high number of partners, smoking and previous STIs, was also included. We considered several scenarios; the baseline assumes universal vaccination to be implemented for 12-year-old females and males. The follow-up period was 55 years. RESULTS According to our preliminary analysis, universal vaccination resulted as a cost-effective alternative when compared to screening-only (with an incremental CE ratio, ICER, of €1,200) and to female-only vaccination (ICER = €6,900). We performed extensive sensitivity analyses to parametric assumptions, which confirmed the good CE profile of universal vaccination in Italy. CONCLUSIONS Universal HPV vaccination of male and female cohorts is cost-effective compared to cervical screening and female-only vaccination, when accounting for a great variety of HPV-related diseases. This is mainly due to the fact that universal vaccination increases the effects of herd immunity and provides indirect protection against HPV.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PIN59

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×