POPULATION-BASED COST-EFFICIENCY SIMULATION OF PARTIAL VERSUS COMPLETE THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN SAUDI ARABIA- APPLICATION OF A BRITISH MODEL

Author(s)

Alomi Y1, Alharbi E2, Alshayban D3, Khoshaim M1, Alhowasi M1, Zamakhshary M1, Alhumaidi A1, Alesseimi M1, Abraham I3
1Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 3University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

OBJECTIVES Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent but preventable complication in hospitalized patients. The objective of this population-based simulation was to estimate, for Saudi Arabia and using a British (NICE) model, the cost-efficiency of partial versus complete thromboprophylaxis of hospitalized adult patients at medium-to-very-high (M2VH)-VTE risk. METHODS Simulation including all 2012 Saudi adult medical (n=2,129,866) and surgical (n=964,033) hospital admissions, expressed in Saudi riyals (SAR), using three scenarios based on published real-world thromboprophylaxis studies: (1) international study and (2) Saudi subsample thereof (Cohen et al, Lancet 2008), and (3) Middle-Eastern study (Mokhtari et al, J Thromb Haemost 2011). Variables included rates for: high bleeding risk (mechanical versus pharmacoprophylaxis); major bleeding episode (MBE) secondary to pharmacoprophylaxis; deep vein thrombosis (DVT; pulmonary embolism (PE); and 12-month DVT/PE readmission following such discharge diagnosis. Costs considered were: thromboprophylaxis; management of MBE, DVT, PE; and 12-month DVT/PE readmission.  RESULTS Scenario (1): total costs for partial and complete prophylaxis were SAR631,462,830 and SAR508,957,517 for a complete-over-partial cost-avoidance by 24.1% of SAR122,505,313/year (SAR92.14 per patient and SAR167.83 per patient at VTE risk). Scenario (2): total costs for partial and complete prophylaxis were SAR712,441,824 and SAR600,483,584 for a complete-over-partial cost-avoidance by 18.6% of SAR111,958,239/year (SAR77.35 per patient and SAR127.58 per patient at VTE risk).  Scenario (3): total costs for partial and complete prophylaxis were SAR749,939,936 and SAR647,300,590 for a complete-over-partial cost-avoidance by 15.9% of SAR102,639,346/year (SAR62.77 per patient and SAR97.84 per patient at VTE risk).  CONCLUSIONS In this population-based cost-efficiency simulation for Saudi Arabia, thromboprophylaxis of all admitted M2VH-VTE risk versus partial methods is associated with significant cost savings per year.  Considering the associated reductions in DVT, PE, and readmissions, even under increased pharmacoprophylaxis-related MBE risk and costs, complete thromboprophylaxis of (M2VH)-VTE risk patients achieves the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Triple Aim of better care, better patient outcomes, and reduced costs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PSY68

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Multiple Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×