OBTAINING INDIRECT UTILITIES WITH THE SF-6D AND THE PORPUS-U IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS

Author(s)

Avila MM1, Pardo Y1, Castells M2, Ferrer F3, Boladeras A3, Pera J3, Prada P4, Guix B5, de Paula B6, Hernandez H7, Pont A1, Alonso J1, Garin O1, Ferrer M1
1IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 3Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 4Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain, 5Fundación IMOR, Barcelona, Spain, 6Instituto Oncológico de Guipúzcoa, Gipuzkoa, Spain, 7Hospital Meixoeiro- Complejo CHUVI, Vigo, Spain

OBJECTIVES To compare indirect utilities for prostate cancer patients obtained with a generic (SF-6D) and a disease-specific instrument (Patient Oriented Prostate Utility Scale, PORPUS-U). METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of 480 prostate cancer patients enrolled in two similar prospective cohorts. The first one included men diagnosed in 2003-2005 with localized prostate cancer (stage T1 or T2) treated with radical prostatectomy, external radiotherapy, or interstitial radiotherapy at 10 hospitals. The second cohort included patients with stage T2 or T3, treated with external radiotherapy alone or combined with brachytherapy, recruited in 2003–2006 at 6 hospitals. Annual computer-assisted telephone interviews carried out in both cohorts included several questionnaires: the SF-36v2 (from which is derived the SF-6D), the PORPUS-U, and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), measuring urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. ANOVA tests were performed to compare the means of utilities among severity groups of severity defined by EPIC items (severe, small or no relevant problem). Effect sizes between extreme groups were calculated to estimate the magnitude of differences. RESULTS Mean age was 66.8 years (SD=6.4) at prostate cancer diagnosis, 20.4% were treated with radical prostatectomy, 33.3% with brachytherapy, 26.7% with external radiotherapy, and 19.6% with combined radiotherapy. The utilities indirectly obtained ranged 0.83-0.99 with PORPUS-U and 0.61-0.84 with SF-6D. Both instruments showed significant differences according to problem severity of all domains measured with EPIC (p<0.001). Utilities for patients without problems were higher than patients with severe problems. The effect sizes between the extreme groups with PORPUS-U and SF-6D were: 1.23 and 1.24 for urinary; 1.03 and 0.75 for bowel; 0.98 and 0.96 for sexual; and 0.94 and 2.17 for hormonal domains. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that both the generic index SF-6D and the disease-specific index PORPUS-U discriminated adequately the problems related to prostate cancer and their treatments.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN183

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×