EVALUATING THE TRANSLATABILITY OF PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT CLINICAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT (COA) ITEMS

Author(s)

McKown S1, Talbert M2, Brandt BA3, Gawlicki MC3
1Corporate Translations, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2Corporate Translations Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 3Corporate Translations, Inc., East Hartford, CT, USA

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study is to determine which physical assessment Clinical Outcomes Assessment (COA) questionnaire items are most translatable. METHODS Eighteen (18) physical assessment items were analyzed, using back-translations to determine conceptual equivalency with the source text. Previous studies have regarded 80% source conceptual equivalency as a translatability benchmark. Translator feedback regarding cultural appropriateness also influenced whether certain physical assessment items were optimal for use in questionnaires, as some items might be translatable, but not appropriate for the target country. RESULTS Physical assessment items were grouped into three categories: highly translatable, moderately translatable, and problematic. Highly translatable examples, “running errands,” “getting around town” and “washing yourself” were translated with conceptual equivalency 100% of the time, and were considered culturally appropriate for all languages. Moderately translatable items, such as “taking a trip” may be misconstrued, as the distance implied may differ across languages. “Bathe yourself” was translated with 87% conceptual equivalency, and may be misunderstood as “taking a bath,” when the intention is to clean oneself. Problematic items, such as “going out,” translated with conceptual equivalency only 76% of the time, requiring a destination or activity to be comprehensible in other languages. “Walking a block,” although achieving 84% conceptual equivalency, is not applicable nor understood in many languages. When measuring distance walked, it is recommended to be specific, using examples such as 100 meters or a kilometer. CONCLUSIONS Specific concepts appear to be more translatable and universal, such as “getting around town” and “walking 100 meters.”  Items left open for interpretation, such as “bathing yourself” or “taking a trip” can cause moderate translation difficultiesAdditionally, many languages cannot coherently translate less specific items, such as “going out,” or translate culturally specific items. Although “walking a block” is translatable, such an example is unlikely to be understood in many languages.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PIH79

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Multiple Diseases, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×