ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF NAB-PACLITAXEL PLUS GEMCITABINE VERSUS GEMCITABINE ALONE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF METASTATIC PANCREATIC CANCER IN GREECE

Author(s)

Fragoulakis V1, Papakostas P2, Pentheroudakis G3, Dervenis C4, Maniadakis N1
1National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece, 2Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece, 3Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, 4Konstantopoulio hospital, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES To estimate the cost-effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel+gemcitabine (Npg) versus gemcitabine (Gem) alone for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in Greece from a National Health System perspective METHODS A Markov model was developed, included several stages such as: “pre-progression on first-line treatment”, “pre-progression off first-line treatment”, “post progression”, “four weeks to death” and “death”. Data from the MPACT trial were used to estimate overall survival (Life-Years-(LYs)) and adverse events. The prices of drugs used in the model are publicly available for all hospitals in Greece. Cost assigned in each health state reflected: drugs, adverse events, monitoring, administration and palliative care. Utility values were obtained from the international literature to estimate Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs). Costs and health gains were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also conducted to construct confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS The mean number of QALYs was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.66–0.78) and 0.56 (95%CI: 0.52–0.60) for Npg and Gem, respectively, giving an incremental gain of  0.15 (95%CI: 0.08-0.25) QALYs in favour of Npg. The mean cost of therapy per patient was estimated at €15,628 (95%CI:€14,377- €17,027) and €8,284 (95%CI:€7,455-€9,112) for Npg and Gem, respectively. The incremental cost per LY gained with Npg was estimated at €37,007 and the incremental cost per QALY gained at €47,120. The probability for Npg to be cost-effective at a threshold three times the per capita income (€60,000 per QALY) was 82%. CONCLUSIONS The severity of pancreatic cancer, in combination with the limited number of effective treatments, results in a high level of unmet need.  If the societal willingness-to-pay threshold for an additional QALY is relatively higher for patients with short life expectancy or for diseases with a relatively higher burden, the combination of nab-paclitaxel+gemcitabine could be considered a cost-effective choice compared with gemcitabine alone in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN105

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×