COST MODEL ANALYSIS OF GORE® PROPATEN® VASCULAR GRAFT VERSUS STANDARD EPTFE VASCULAR GRAFT FOR INFRAPOPLITEAL BYPASS IN PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE (PAD) MANAGEMENT- SPANISH SCENARIO

Author(s)

Scarpa F
W.L.GORE & Associati S.r.l., Verona, Italy

OBJECTIVES Demonstrate the cost savings of using the GORE® PROPATEN® Vascular Graft compared to standard ePTFE vascular grafts in the management of PAD patients. Superior clinical outcomes in terms of primary / secondary patency and limb salvage rates result in lower average per-patient treatment costs. Background: Vascular bypass is used in patients with PAD (Peripheral Arterial Disease) to treat ischemic rest pain, to improve walking distance in patients with severe life-limiting claudication, and to save limbs that might otherwise require amputation. When patients presenting for peripheral artery reconstruction have absent or inadequate saphenous veins due to prior use, small size, or poor quality, vascular surgeons may choose a prosthetic bypass graft. The GORE® PROPATEN® Vascular Graft features a proprietary end-point covalent linkage of heparin molecules to the luminal surface of the graft that provides sustained resistance to thrombosis. METHODS A cost model analysis was developed to represent hospital treatment costs. A typical PAD patient’s treatment pathway in Spanish clinical practice was identified by a survey involving Spanish vascular surgeons. A literature review was conducted to determine patency and limb salvage rates.Spanish GRD AP27–2012-Ministerio de Sanidad tariffs were used as hospital cost of treatment inputs. A three-year patient management cycle was considered. RESULTS Better patency and limb salvage rates obtained using the GORE® PROPATEN® Vascular Graft result in fewer reinterventions and amputations, corresponding to lower per-patient treatment costs. The cost model demonstrates an overall cost saving for PAD patient management using the GORE® PROPATEN® Vascular Graft for infrapopliteal bypass. The cumulative cost savings at 3 years is estimated to be 11.671€ per patient. CONCLUSIONS The use of the GORE® PROPATEN® Vascular Graft for infrapopliteal bypass in the PAD patient population represents a safe, clinically effective, and cost-saving alternative to standard ePTFE vascular grafts.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCV104

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×