COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SAXAGLIPTIN COMPARED TO GLP-1 ANALOGUES AS AN ADD-ON TO INSULIN IN THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS FROM A UK HEALTH CARE PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Charokopou M1, Vioix H2, Verheggen B1, Eddowes LA3, Griffiths M4, Gabriel Z2, Tolley K5, Sibartie M2
1Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2AstraZeneca UK Ltd., Luton, UK, 3Costello Medical Consulting Ltd., Cambridge, UK, 4Costello Medical Consulting, Cambridge, UK, 5Tolley Health Economics Ltd., Buxton, Derbyshire, UK

OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), compared to the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, exenatide twice-daily or lixisenatide, when added to insulin (±metformin) for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are inadequately controlled on insulin. METHODS The validated CARDIFF diabetes model was used to conduct the analyses. Clinical inputs for the model were sourced from a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), which found that the treatments were similarly effective at lowering HbA1c and that the GLP-1 analogues resulted in greater and clinically relevant weight loss. A UK healthcare perspective was used for costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility data sourced from the published literature. To assess uncertainty, univariate deterministic and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS Saxagliptin was found to dominate lixisenatide in the base case, being associated with lower costs (-£472 [95%CI: -1,378, -223]) and slightly more QALYs (0.010 [95%CI: -0.040, 0.076]). Saxagliptin was less costly (-£1,402 [95%CI: -£1,932, -£1,218]) and slightly less effective (-0.012 QALYs [95%CI: -0.054, 0.035]) than exenatide twice-daily. The lower costs associated with saxagliptin were primarily due to the lower drug acquisition costs. The estimated QALY differences were small and associated with the impact of weight reduction on health-related quality of life. Univariate sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were most sensitive to varying the HbA1c treatment effect and the effect of saxagliptin on weight change. The PSA estimated that saxagliptin had a 70.4% and 34.3% probability of being dominant, and a 99.4% and 100% probability of being cost-saving compared to lixisenatide and exenatide twice-daily, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Saxagliptin as add-on to insulin was shown to be a cost-saving treatment option from a UK healthcare perspective for patients with T2DM who are inadequately controlled on insulin.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PDB89

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×