COST COMPARISON AMONG FIRST LINE MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES-BASED ONCOLOGY TREATMENT PROTOCOLS

Author(s)

Jakovljevic M1, Gutzwiller FS2, Schwenkglenks M2, Milovanovic O3, Rancic N4, Varjacic M3, Stojadinovic D5, Dagovic A6, Matter-Walstra K2
1The Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia and Montenegro, 2University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 3Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia and Montenegro, 4Military Medical Academy University of Defence Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, 5Urology Clinic, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia and Montenegro, 6Oncology and Radiation Therapy Center, Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia and Montenegro

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the costs of first-line monoclonal antibodies (mABs) treatment protocols in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and colorectal carcinoma in South-Εastern Europe. METHODS: A retrospective, bottom-up case series study design was implemented with one-year time horizon and payer’s perspective. The study sample size was 265 patients (breast cancer, N=137, colorectal cancer, N=44, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, N=84) while treatment protocols included adjuvant mAbs: trastuzumab (N=137), bevacizumab (N=28), cetuximab (N=16) and rituximab (N=84). ICD-10 related,direct medical and lost productivity costs (€) across treatment groups during 2010-2013. RESULTS: The average length of observation was 128±97 days per patient. Total mean direct and indirect costs of care were: trastuzumab breast cancer group €17,740; bevacizumab colorectal carcinoma group €8,775; cetuximab colorectal carcinoma group €27,181 and rituximab non-Hodgkin lymphoma group €19,431An average mAbs-treated patient incurred €17,897 costs of medical care. The total combined budget of these 265 patients was €4,742,775. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mAbs strongly correlated with high costs in first-line cancer medical care and dominated other cost domains. Cetuximab-based treatment protocol in colorectal carcinoma patients was substantially more expensive compared to trastuzumab (C50); bevacizumab (C20) and rituximab (C80) alternatives. Extremely high costs of mAbs are the key-issue for Eastern European policy makers by crossing the upper limits of affordability in middle-income economies.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN89

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×