WHICH CRITERIA ARE USED IN HEALTH CARE DECISIONMAKING AND PRIORITY SETTING? A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF DECISIONMAKERS

Author(s)

Guindo LA1, Wagner M2, Baltussen R3, Rindress D2, Van Til J4, Kind P5, Goetghebeur M21MSc Candidate, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2BioMedCom Consultants Inc., Dorval, QC, Canada, 3Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4University

OBJECTIVES: Resource allocation is one of the most challenging issues faced by health policy decision-makers requiring efficient consideration of many factors. Objectives of this study are to identify criteria used in decisionmaking around the world. METHODS: An extensive literature search was performed in Medline and EMBASE to identify articles reporting decision criteria. Bibliographies of relevant articles were also searched. Studies conducted with healthcare decisionmakers (e.g., empirical studies, field-testing of decisionmaking tools, focus groups, questionnaires, interviews), conceptual and reviews articles as well as articles describing decisionmaking tools were included. Criteria reported were extracted and organized using a classification system derived from the EVIDEM framework. RESULTS: A total of 2903 records were identified through database searching and 243 additional records were identified through bibliographic hand searching; of these 2790 were excluded. 356 articles were assessed for eligibility and 40 articles were included in the study. Large variations in terminology used to defined criteria were observed and 338 different terms were identified. These were assigned to 58 unique criteria which were classified in 9 different categories including: 1) health outcomes and benefits of intervention, 2) types of health benefit, 3) impact of disease targeted by intervention, 4) therapeutic context of intervention, 5) economic impact of intervention, 6) quality/uncertainty of evidence, 7) implementation complexity of intervention, 8) priority, fairness and ethics, 9) overall context. The most frequently mentioned criteria were: equity/fairness (33 times), efficacy/effectiveness (28), healthcare stakeholder interests and pressures (28), cost-effectiveness (23), strength of evidence (20), safety (19), mission and mandate of health system (17), need (16), organizational requirements and capacity (17) and patient reported outcomes (16). CONCLUSIONS: The data synthesized in this study will serve as the basis for development of an international survey of healthcare decisionmakers. The ultimate objective is to develop multicriteria approaches to efficient healthcare decisionmaking and priority setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PHP102

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×