VALIDATION OF THE HUNTINGTON CLINICAL SELF-REPORTED INSTRUMENT (H-CSRI), A CLINIMETRIC PATIENT ASSESSED SCALE FOR PATIENTS WITH HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE

Author(s)

Clay E1, Dorey J2, Toumi M3, Tedroff J4, Squitieri F5, De Nicola N5, Verny C61Creativ Research, Paris, France, 2Creativ Ceutical, Paris, France, 3University of Lyon, Lyon, France, 4NEUROSEARCH, Ballerup, Denmark, 5Neurogenetics and Rare Disease Centre, Po

OBJECTIVES: Huntington’s disease (HD) is a rare neurodegenerative disease affecting motor, cognitive and psychological function. Data collection is difficult because of the low prevalence and the small number of specialized centers. The creation of a specific self-administered questionnaire covering various clinical aspects of the disease would make the HD-patient clinical data collection easier. Such an instrument also offers the advantage of allowing a remote follow-up and getting information on the development of motor, functional and behavioral disorders of HD patients perceived by the patient himself. The objective of this study is to validate a new self-reported clinical instrument for HD-patients. METHODS: The European HD burden study (Euro-HDB) is an ongoing cross-sectional survey among HD-patients and their caregivers in six European countries. The H-CSRI, a self-reported instrument based on the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) and developed with the expertise of a neurologist and a psychiatrist, was administered. It included three subscales assessing the motor, functional and behavioural ability. Classical test theory and item response theory were used to assess its clinimetric properties. RESULTS: Among 311 patients from both Italy and France, item response rates range from 86% to 99%. There was a floor effect on items related to psychotic disorder in the behavioral subscale, because these symptoms do not affect all patients. The H-CSRI showed an acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alphas>0.74). Factor analyses demonstrated a satisfactory construct validity. Moreover, the item internal consistency and item discriminant validity criteria were met. The differential item functioning analyses showed no item bias between the two countries and between genders. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the validity of the H-CSRI to assess the health status for patients with HD. Planned next steps include assessments of responsiveness to change, test–retest reliability and convergence between UHDRS and H-CSRI scales.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PND29

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×