HEALTH CARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND ECONOMIC BURDEN OF METASTATIC AND RECURRENT LOCALLY-ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS

Author(s)

Le TK1, Winfree KB1, Yang H2, Marynchenko M2, Yu AP2, Frois C2, Wu EQ21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To assess healthcare resource utilization and economic burden associated with metastatic and recurrent, locally-advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Administrative claims from Medicare- and privately-insured individuals during 2004-2008 were used in this retrospective database study of patients with metastatic or recurrent, locally-advanced HNC.  Patients diagnosed with HNC were matched 1:1 to cancer-free control patients in order to measure the incremental economic burden of metastatic and recurrent, locally-advanced HNC.  Outcomes of interest were measured during the 6 months following 1) date of a secondary tumor diagnosis for metastatic patients, or 2) date of a diagnosis indicating recurrent, locally-advanced HNC.  The multivariable comparison of healthcare utilization rates was based on a logistic regression model.  Costs were reported in 2008 US dollars from the perspective of a third-party payer and were analyzed using generalized linear models and two-part regression models.  Regression models were adjusted for age and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (excluding cancer diagnoses) differences between HNC and control patients.  RESULTS:   The metastatic HNC cohort consisted of 1,042 patients; the cohort of recurrent, locally-advanced HNC included 324 patients.  Compared to cancer-free patients, a higher proportion of metastatic HNC patients had ≥ 1claim for inpatient (OR=26.4), outpatient (OR=35.3), and ER visits (OR=4.4).  Recurrent, locally-advanced HNC patients also had higher utilization rates for inpatient (OR=4.7) and ER visits (OR=4.9).  All differences were statistically significant (p<0.0001). Incremental adjusted total costs were $60,414 per patient for metastatic HNC and $21,141 per patient for recurrent, locally-advanced HNC (p<0.0001).  Approximately 46-58% of the incremental cost was attributable to outpatient visits, 27-37% to inpatient costs, and 11-13% to pharmacy, depending on the cohort. CONCLUSIONS:   Healthcare resource utilization and economic burden of patients with metastatic or recurrent, locally-advanced HNC is substantial compared to cancer-free patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PCN101

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×