AN ECONOMIC MODEL OF THE EFFECTS OF QUICK RELEASE BROMOCRIPTINE MESYLATE VERSUS ALTERNATIVE ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS ON HOSPITALIZATIONS AND COSTS

Author(s)

Menzin J1, Duczakowski C1, Friedman M1, Neumann P2, Scranton R31Boston Health Economics, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA, 2Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA, 3Veroscience, LLC, Tiverton, RI, USA

OBJECTIVES: Quick release (QR)-bromocriptine mesylate is a new treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) that has been shown to reduce HbA1c and cardiovascular (CV)-related hospitalizations over one year. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic impact of (QR)-bromocriptine versus other oral antidiabetic drugs as add-on therapy for patients who failed initial treatment. METHODS: A decision-analysis model was designed to compare outcomes among QR-bromocriptine, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, and sitagliptin over one year when used as add-on therapy. For each drug, changes in HbA1c levels were derived from product labels and used to derive the expected number of hospitalizations for diabetes-related complications based on published equations linking HbA1c levels to hospitalizations. Rates of CV-related events (major adverse cardiac events, congestive heart failure, angina, and revascularization) were extracted from clinical trial reports of antidiabetic drugs in T2DM and were expressed on an annualized basis. Hospital costs per admission were estimated from the Healthcare Cost & Utilization Project, while drug costs were based on wholesale acquisition cost. A payer perspective was assumed and direct medical costs were expressed in 2009 USD. RESULTS: Patients treated with QR-bromocriptine had lower diabetes-related hospitalization costs ($2,017) than those receiving rosiglitazone ($2,038), and higher costs compared to pioglitazone ($1,928) and sitagliptin ($1,989).  Patients receiving QR-bromocriptine had lower CV-related hospitalization costs ($426) than those treated pioglitazone, sitagliptin, or rosiglitazone ($523, $708, and $729, respectively). Annual drug costs were lower for patients receiving QR-bromocriptine ($2,122) compared to pioglitazone ($2,605) and sitagliptin ($2,282) and higher than for those receiving rosiglitazone ($1,977). Overall one-year costs were estimated to be $4,565, $5,056, $4,979, and $4,745 for QR-bromocriptine, pioglitazone, sitagliptin, and rosiglitazone respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, over one year, T2DM patients treated with QR-bromocriptine as an add-on therapy are expected to have lower costs than those receiving pioglitazone, sitagliptin, and rosiglitazone.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PDB36

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×