ADHERENCE IS ADHERENCE IS ADHERENCE- THE CONSISTENCY OF MORISKY ADHERENCE SCORES ACROSS THE COSTLIEST CHRONIC CONDITIONS

Author(s)

DiBonaventura MD1, Annunziata K2, Goren A1, Gupta S21Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA, 2Kantar Health, Princeton, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Patient non-adherence to prescribed therapies has been shown to be associated with worse health outcomes. However, it is unclear the extent to which adherence varies as a function of the condition versus the patient. The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency of adherence scores across the costliest chronic conditions in the U.S. METHODS: Data from the 2010 U.S. National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) were used. Included for analysis were only those patients (N=32,636) who reported using a medication for their asthma, pain, congestive heart failure (CHF), COPD, diabetes, hypertension, depression, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or stroke. Adherence, measured using the four-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), was assessed separately for each condition. Health utilities were also assessed using the SF-12v2. RESULTS: Among patients taking prescription medication for asthma (n=4,786), pain (n=8,984), CHF (n=905), COPD (n=1,664), diabetes (n=7,065), hypertension (n=19,475), depression (n=7,850), bipolar disorder (n=1,425), PVD (n=163), TIA (n=437), or stroke (n=507), 48.9% were male, 79.3% were white, and mean age was 54.9 years (SD=15.3). Across all conditions, high internal consistency was observed for total MMAS scores (Cronbach’s a=0.97) and all MMAS items (“careless about taking medications”, a=0.97; “stop taking medications when feeling better”, a=0.94; “stop taking medications when feeling worse”, a=0.96; and “forgetting to take medications”, a=0.97).  Number of respondents sharing any two conditions ranged from n=9 to n=4563, yet MMAS total score correlations across any two conditions were all significant, ranging from r=0.41 to r=1.00. With the exception of pain, non-adherence within each condition was associated with lower health utilities (though not always significantly: r=-0.02 to r=-0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that adherence is a stable construct, consistent from condition to condition for each patient. Non-adherence on one therapy may be an indicator of non-adherence on another therapy.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PRM15

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×