UPDATE ON PHARMACOECONOMICS IN NUTRITION- PARENTERAL GLUTAMINE SUPPLEMENT IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS

Author(s)

Povero M*1;Zaniolo O1;Muscaritoli M2, Eandi M3 1AdRes HE&OR, Turin, Italy, 2University La Sapienza, Roma, Italy, 3University of Torino, Torino, Italy

OBJECTIVES: To re-evaluate the economic consequences of parenteral glutamine supplementation (PGS) in light of the recent metaanalysis confirming that PGS at a dose >0,20 g/kg body weight per day in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is associated with reduced mortality, infection rate (IR) and length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A simulation model was updated with the new meta-analysis data and clinical inputs for the control group from Italian ICU population reported in “Progetto Margherita”. Costs are evaluated from the perspective of the Italian hospital and derive from official sources. Sensitivity analyses are undertaken to test results’ reliability RESULTS: PGS is predicted to reduce mortality rates (-29.0%), IR (-21.2%) and overall LOS (-1.07 days/patient), yielding a saving of € 1,047 per patient treated. Treatment costs are completely offset by the reduction in hospital stay costs and antibiotic costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates PGS strategy as dominant in more than 90% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Also with contemporary comparative efficacy data is PGS in ICU patients expected to be effective in improving outcomes and containing costs in Italian hospitals providing intensive care.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PRS32

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Pediatrics, Reproductive and Sexual Health, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×